+1 (non-binding). Fantastic work on the KIP Ryanne.
> On Dec 25, 2018, at 9:10 AM, Stephane Maarek
> wrote:
>
> +1 ! Great stuff
>
> Stephane
>
> On Mon., 24 Dec. 2018, 12:07 pm Edoardo Comar
>> +1 non-binding
>>
>> thanks for the KIP
>> --
>
Hi,
a quick question on the KIP-298 Dead letter queue, as I read from the KIP
is only available for the Sink connectors.
While I know the challenges of defining a dead-letter queue for the
incoming messages, I wanted ask/discuss what is the sense in here for this,
do you completely discard the op
Hi,
if I understand your question properly you are aiming to validate failure
scenarios. I usually see this done for learning purposes, basically to
answer how Kafka would react to such and such situation? or to validate the
current setup / configuration an Organisation have.
For the first one, o
