[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15197199#comment-15197199
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on KAFKA-3411:
---
GitHub user miguno opened a pull request:
GitHub user miguno opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/1081
KAFKA-3411: Streams: stop using "job" terminology, rename job.id to
application.id
@guozhangwang @ymatsuda : please review.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ g
Michael Noll created KAFKA-3411:
---
Summary: Streams: rename job.id to application.id
Key: KAFKA-3411
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3411
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Noll updated KAFKA-3411:
Summary: Streams: stop using "job" terminology, rename job.id to
application.id (was: Streams: rena
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eno Thereska closed KAFKA-3401.
---
> Message format change on the fly breaks 0.9 consumer
> -
1. But there is no way of conveying version mismatch in the protocol, that's
one of the reasons for this KIP in the first place :)
Even if there was (e.g., the empty response hack) it makes the client
implementation
more complex since the cached cluster-level version support returned by the
broker