[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13663605#comment-13663605
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-914:
---
Thanks for the patch. Looks good. +1. One minor comment: The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joel Koshy updated KAFKA-914:
-
Attachment: KAFKA-914-v1.patch
Patch with the mentioned fix.
1 - I added comments with some detail since
In my case, there is a load balancer between the producers and the
brokers, so I want the behavior described for the Java client (null key
specifies "any partition"). If the Key field of each individual message
specifies the partition to send it to, then I don't understand the purpose
of the 32-bi
Dave,
Colin described the producer behavior of picking the partition for a
message before it is sent to Kafka broker correctly. However, I'm
interested in knowing your use case a little before to see why you would
rather have the broker decide the partition?
Thanks,
Neha
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at
The key is used by the client to decide which partition to send the
message to. By the time the client is creating the produce request, it
should be known which partition each message is being sent to. I believe
Neha described the behavior of the Java client which sends messages with
a null key to
I'm looking at the document entitled "A Guide to the Kafka Protocol"
located here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/KAFKA/a-guide-to-the-kafka-protocol.html
It shows a produce request as containing a number of message sets, which are
grouped first by topic and second by partition (a 32-bit integer).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Eigenbrodt resolved KAFKA-913.
-
Resolution: Invalid
Indeed. I mixed up the git branches and tried it on "trunk". on 0.8 i
No. In 0.8, if you don't specify a key for a message, it is sent to any of
the available partitions. In other words, the partition id is selected on
the partition and the server doesn't get -1 as the partition id.
Thanks,
Neha
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Dave Peterson wrote:
> In the versi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13663146#comment-13663146
]
Joel Koshy commented on KAFKA-914:
--
One more point: [td3] above does not need to originate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13663131#comment-13663131
]
Neha Narkhede commented on KAFKA-901:
-
Thanks for the quick review, committed it
In the version 0.8 wire format for a produce request, does a value of -1
still indicate "use a random partition" as it did for 0.7?
Thanks,
Dave
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13663118#comment-13663118
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-901:
---
Thanks for the second followup patch. +1.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13663093#comment-13663093
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-913:
---
Did you try this on the latest of the 0.8 branch? What OS di
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao resolved KAFKA-912.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
> [Documentation] 0.8 Quickstart mentions sbt assembly-package-dependency -
> not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao closed KAFKA-912.
-
> [Documentation] 0.8 Quickstart mentions sbt assembly-package-dependency -
> not needed
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Neha Narkhede updated KAFKA-901:
Attachment: kafka-901-followup2.patch
I agree. Kept only the 2nd logging message about caching the l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13663063#comment-13663063
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-901:
---
Thanks for the followup patch. Some comments:
60. KafkaApis
Joel Koshy created KAFKA-914:
Summary: Deadlock between initial rebalance and watcher-triggered
rebalances
Key: KAFKA-914
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-914
Project: Kafka
Issu
18 matches
Mail list logo