[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-910) Randomize the backoff in the clients to avoid all clients from sending metadata requests at the same time

2013-05-17 Thread Neha Narkhede (JIRA)
Neha Narkhede created KAFKA-910: --- Summary: Randomize the backoff in the clients to avoid all clients from sending metadata requests at the same time Key: KAFKA-910 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-91

[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-901) Kafka server can become unavailable if clients send several metadata requests

2013-05-17 Thread Neha Narkhede (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Neha Narkhede updated KAFKA-901: Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Thanks for your careful reviews.

[jira] [Closed] (KAFKA-901) Kafka server can become unavailable if clients send several metadata requests

2013-05-17 Thread Neha Narkhede (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Neha Narkhede closed KAFKA-901. --- > Kafka server can become unavailable if clients send several metadata requests >

[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-901) Kafka server can become unavailable if clients send several metadata requests

2013-05-17 Thread Jun Rao (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13661113#comment-13661113 ] Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-901: --- Some minor comments: 50. KafkaApis.handleTopicMetadataReque

[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-901) Kafka server can become unavailable if clients send several metadata requests

2013-05-17 Thread Jun Rao (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13661104#comment-13661104 ] Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-901: --- Thanks for patch v5. Looks good. +1. I have some minor follo

[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-901) Kafka server can become unavailable if clients send several metadata requests

2013-05-17 Thread Neha Narkhede (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Neha Narkhede updated KAFKA-901: Attachment: kafka-901-v5.patch All review comments are addressed. Also made another change to update

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-909) Provide support in the producer to specify a stateful instance of an Encoder, like the consuemr allows with the Decoder

2013-05-17 Thread Rob Withers (JIRA)
Rob Withers created KAFKA-909: - Summary: Provide support in the producer to specify a stateful instance of an Encoder, like the consuemr allows with the Decoder Key: KAFKA-909 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows

[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-901) Kafka server can become unavailable if clients send several metadata requests

2013-05-17 Thread Neha Narkhede (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13660866#comment-13660866 ] Neha Narkhede commented on KAFKA-901: - I'm not sure I understood your review comment #4

[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-901) Kafka server can become unavailable if clients send several metadata requests

2013-05-17 Thread Jun Rao (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13660835#comment-13660835 ] Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-901: --- Thanks for patch v4. A few more comments: 40. KafkaControll

[jira] [Comment Edited] (KAFKA-901) Kafka server can become unavailable if clients send several metadata requests

2013-05-17 Thread Neha Narkhede (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13660269#comment-13660269 ] Neha Narkhede edited comment on KAFKA-901 at 5/17/13 3:53 PM: --

Re: C/C++ Client

2013-05-17 Thread anand nalya
Hi Joel, Any updates on the c++ producer? Thanks, Anand On 3 April 2013 05:59, Joel Koshy wrote: > Yes - we would be interested in doing that. I have been spending most of my > time over the past couple weeks on the C++ library (currently, only for the > producer). It is reasonably stable, alt