Re: GraphReferenceManager

2022-07-28 Thread Murray Altheim
On 2022/07/29 15:11, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: Hi Murray, Just a quick note, current wiki syntax allows a second | in order to support link attributes, e.g., [Page|MyPage|title='Page']. Markdown syntax allows the same thing using [](){}, IIRC, so perhaps [Subject|Predicate::Object] (or

Re: GraphReferenceManager

2022-07-28 Thread Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
Hi Murray, Just a quick note, current wiki syntax allows a second | in order to support link attributes, e.g., [Page|MyPage|title='Page']. Markdown syntax allows the same thing using [](){}, IIRC, so perhaps [Subject|Predicate::Object] (or something like that) could be used instead? cheers, juan

Re: GraphReferenceManager

2022-07-28 Thread Murray Altheim
On 2022/07/29 6:01, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: Hi Murray, ahh ok, now I see, so I guess we could start by making the reference manager pluggable through a wiki property, so anyone wishing to use it can do so easily. Hi Juan Pablo, The one pseudo-proposal I'm considering adding to the

Re: GraphReferenceManager

2022-07-28 Thread Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
gt; > On 26/07/22 6:30 am, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: > > Hi Murray! > > > > nice to see you on the dev list again :-) > > Yes, thanks, good to see you as well. Many years... .. . > > > lots of interesting points on your email, my POV on them: > >

Re: GraphReferenceManager

2022-07-26 Thread Murray Altheim
On 26/07/22 6:30 am, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: Hi Murray! nice to see you on the dev list again :-) Yes, thanks, good to see you as well. Many years... .. . lots of interesting points on your email, my POV on them: - re. GraphReferenceManager: I fail to see how it works

Re: GraphReferenceManager

2022-07-25 Thread Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
Hi Murray! nice to see you on the dev list again :-) lots of interesting points on your email, my POV on them: - re. GraphReferenceManager: I fail to see how it works, would you mind sharing a concrete example? it is not clear to me if it needs a syntax change or not, or if the current syntax