Hi,
This looks like a pretty valuable API enhancement for plugins. Considering
the ticket is almost 2 years old is there any chance of this getting done as
2.0 is just around the corner?
-Nick
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Improve-plug
Hi Denis,
>> if you want to deserialize an entry then most likely you’re doing this on
>> the app side that already has the class in the class path
In this particular case the app is a deployed service and the hosting node
doesn't have the class files on its classpath. I implemented a way to depl
Hi Denis, Val,
Please refer to my initial inquiry on the user forum for full context as I
think that was lost while cross-posting to here:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/BinaryObjectImpl-deserializeValue-with-specific-ClassLoader-td12055.html
The setting in IgniteConfiguration doe
Hi Alexei,
I believe the problem with that approach is that I won't be able to reload
classes because there is a single classloader that Ignite is referencing.
When I undeploy a service I also want to allow the corresponding classloader
(there is 1 per service) and classes to get reclaimed by the
Hi Guys,
Sorry to post this in a voting thread, but I tried to update a project to
2.0 (using the git tag Denis referred to) and I'm seeing what I assume is a
regression. In short, attempts to access a pre-configured cache within the
onIgniteStart() method of a PluginProvider now returns null inst
Hey Denis,
I tried your solution as that is what Alexei was more-or-less suggesting:
create a delegating classloader, but in this case delegate to whatever
context class loader is set. The problem is that resolved classes will
always be stored by the instantiated classloader, which would be the
de
Thanks Denis!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Re-BinaryObjectImpl-deserializeValue-with-specific-ClassLoader-tp17126p17524.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I can outline a use-case I have which may help define requirements for this
task. For context, I was originally going to try and address the below
use-case by disabling automatic rebalancing on a per-cache basis and use a
cluster-wide task to orchestrate manual rebalancing; however, this issue
soun
Hi Alexandr,
Yes, I'm using a StreamReceiver since I'm mostly using the cache as a
router. The implementation is more-or-less like the following:
The StreamPipeline is managed by the data node which contains the stages
that make up the pipeline and what service is responsible for each stage
(th
I wanted to provide an update on where I am at with this as I'm still
exploring different options.
For the time being I've taken the path of using a delegating ClassLoader in
IgniteConfiguration as was previously suggested; however, with the
difference being that whenever a service is deployed/und
Hi,
Would IGNITE-6827 potentially be a workaround for IGNITE-6967? I understand
that eventually IGNITE-6967 will not be applicable once the service grid
stops using the utility cache and switches to discovery messages, but I've
encountered odd deadlocks with PME and I'm growing more suspicious tha
I think any ticket that results in less work being done is important, even if
it's small, because the accumulation of these savings can have significant
impact.
I can't comment on how a lot of these may impact users like myself, but I'd
like to echo that this is indeed a severe pain point that I r
12 matches
Mail list logo
