Anyone willing to help me a bit to finish this ticket for 1.6? :-) Thanks!
On 4/12/2016 6:03 AM, Vladimir Ozerov (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15237114#comment-1523711
Hello,
I am playing with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1144 as
introduction to hacking on Ignite. I am not a Java developer by day but
have experience writing code in various languages. This is my first
in-depth exposure to Ignite internals (have lightly used it as a user in
a
On 1/27/2016 5:33 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
Hi,
We should assign the ticket to you. Can you please send your Jira username
here (you can create one)? This way I will add you to a list of Ignite
contributors in Jira and assign the ticket to you.
D.
Dmitriy, username is "maketo". Thanks!
have a reference to
GridCacheContext which represents the underlying cache for the data
structure. GridCacheContext.name() will give you the correct cache name
that you can use when calling affinityRun method.
-Val
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Dood@ODDO wrote:
Hello,
I am playing with https
Hello all,
I am working on a ticket that is not very difficult, if you are good
with Idea, Java, Maven etc. I have been a developer in various languages
but new to Java ;).
I had JDK8 installed and I introduced some changes to the code base that
cause it to not compile (apparently) against t
Hello all,
This may be a very dumb question (and feel free to "reprimand" me ;-)
but I will ask it anyways.
I am working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1144 and
one of the comments on the submitted code was that I marked both methods
I am implemented as @IgniteAsyncSupported
new
affinityRun and affinityCall methods that you're adding, but I'm not sure
about others.
Does anyone has thoughts on this?
-Val
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Dood@ODDO wrote:
Hello all,
This may be a very dumb question (and feel free to "reprimand" me ;-) but
I wil
On 2/19/2016 4:53 AM, Roman Shtykh wrote:
Igniters,
Any reason for 'scalar' module not to be exposed on
readme.io/ignite.apache.org, and no scaladoc link?
-Roman
Roman, in my humble opinion it is a good thing scalar is not mentioned
anywhere - it is a rather "strange" method of using Ignite
Hello all - are there any common points between the two? Where can they
be made to work together, if at all?
Thanks!
:56 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
I am a bit unclear from the Apache Arrow website. Is Apache Arrow a
columnar in-memory database or is it a processing engine?
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Dood@ODDO wrote:
Hello all - are there any common points between the two? Where can they be
made to work
That's the million dollar question - I think we should approach the
Arrow people and get a conversation going. We want to be ahead of the
curve, not behind it - Arrow seems to be making quite a stir, not to
mention that it was fast-tracked to mature project status apparently
solely based on the
Hello all,
I was wondering if anyone can take a look at the PR I submitted for
IGNITE-1144 [1]. It compiles and I think the code is good but the tests
I submitted are failing - specifically, one test: I am using
assertThrows() to make sure that an exception is thrown if affinityRun()
is invok
Val,
All the test passed on TC - you can look at the PR at any time. Thanks!
On 2/22/2016 8:13 PM, Valentin Kulichenko wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the pull request! I will take a look as soon as possible.
-Val
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Dood@ODDO wrote:
Hello all,
I was wondering if
On 2/23/2016 7:05 PM, Valentin Kulichenko wrote:
I added couple more tests and merged your changes into master. Thanks for
the contribution!
Thanks! What other ticket do you think I could/should tackle?
IGNITE-1144 has been fixed so at least that obstacle is out of the way :-)
On 2/24/2016 9:10 AM, Denis Magda wrote:
The community has already faced with the issue that the binary mode is
not supported for data structures.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2339
I've linked this ticke
On 2/24/2016 1:31 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 02:13PM, Dood@ODDO wrote:
That's the million dollar question - I think we should approach the
Arrow people and get a conversation going. We want to be ahead of
the curve, not behind it - Arrow seems to be making qu
On 2/25/2016 11:06 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 02:02PM, Dood@ODDO wrote:
On 2/24/2016 1:31 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 02:13PM, Dood@ODDO wrote:
That's the million dollar question - I think we should approach the
Arrow people and
+1 - sounds very reasonable and practical.
On 3/3/2016 5:54 AM, Denis Magda wrote:
Igniters,
I would propose to switch back to review-then-commit process. This
process has to be followed by both contributors and committers.
There is a reason for this I have in mind. Ignite is a complex
plat
Hello,
This is my second Ignite ticket and if I understand correctly, it is a
simple fix - I submitted a patch recently, it is only a few lines. Can
someone take a look and see if I am on the right track or did I
completely misunderstand it... :-)
Thanks!
Hello all,
I am working on IGNITE-2693 with Vlad Ozerov's help. I am somewhat of a
Java newbie so please be gentle ;-)
I am curious about something - after reading the Javadocs and Binary
Marshaller docs on Ignite's documentation websites, I think that the
documentation is not very friendly
On 3/9/2016 6:43 PM, Alexey Goncharuk wrote:
Hi,
The current version of test is not very clean and it works only because
withKeepBinary() is a noop. The correct version would be to use plain cache
for non-binary-object entry processor and use withKeepBinary for
binary-object entry processor. You
On 3/9/2016 7:46 PM, Alexey Goncharuk wrote:
Note that withKeepBinary() is just a way to tell a cache not to deserialize
values when doing a get or running an entry processor. The concept of
binary object does not belong solely to caches - you can get an instance of
IgniteBinary interface from Ig
22 matches
Mail list logo
