Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Removal of ignitevisorcmd

2022-12-01 Thread Maxim Muzafarov
+1 > GridClient and related classes are not used by visorcmd, but used by > control.sh and can't be removed. I think it should not be too difficult to migrate GridClient -> IgniteClient and once it will happen the removal becomes be possible. On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 07:30, Alex Plehanov wrote:

Re:[DISCUSSION] Removal of ignitevisorcmd

2022-12-01 Thread Taras Ledkov
Hi, +1 for remove Visor related code. Unfortunately we have to migrate `control-utility` to use IgniteClient (thin client) before drop GridClient. I guess we will do it in the future. Also, the old thin JDBC based on the GridClient (classes placed at the org.apache.ignite.internal.jdbc.*) must

Re: [DISCUSSION] Removal of ignitevisorcmd

2022-12-01 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
PR is ready for review - https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/10411 чт, 1 дек. 2022 г. в 16:49, Taras Ledkov : > Hi, > > +1 for remove Visor related code. > Unfortunately we have to migrate `control-utility` to use IgniteClient > (thin client) before drop GridClient. I guess we will do it in the

A new feedback has been added : 99

2022-12-01 Thread Bugyard
A new feedback has been added, go to bugyard.io to see all the details... https://bugyard.io A new feedback has been added "Need to amend city_id to company_id for Primary Key definition"   by jury.gerzhedowich View feedback https://app.bugyard.io/web/app/rycqZJDyY/f/6388bd86b6f6cf00142adea

Re: [DISCUSSION] Removal of ignitevisorcmd

2022-12-01 Thread Вячеслав Коптилин
Hi Igniters, I fully support the idea to stop supporting Visor and removing its implementation. However, do we have a list of useful features that do not exist in our control utility? Perhaps, it makes sense to reimplement such functionality and provide it based on control.sh script. Thanks, Slav