Hello!
We no longer advertise SQL transactions so it's only logical.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
чт, 13 янв. 2022 г. в 20:28, Bugyard :
> A new feedback has been added, go to bugyard.io to see all the details...
>
> https://bugyard.io
>
> A new feedback has been added
>
> "There is bug in 2.1
Hello, All
I’d like to join the community and contribute to the Ignite.
Would you please grant me the contributors permissions in Jira. My account
is serge.korotkov
Thanks,
--
Sergey
I will proceed with the implementation.
Hello Igniters,
IMHO, this is not a good idea to change the behavior of serviceProxy()
depending on statistics (enabled/disabled). It seems counterintuitive to me.
Perhaps, we need to introduce a new method that should always return a
proxy to the user service.
Thanks,
Slava.
вт, 28 дек. 2021 г
Hello, Sergey.
Welcome to the Ignite community.
I’ve added you to the contributor list.
> 18 янв. 2022 г., в 14:22, Sergey Korotkov
> написал(а):
>
> Hello, All
>
> I’d like to join the community and contribute to the Ignite.
>
> Would you please grant me the contributors permissions in Jira
What are the metrics that are being affected by this?
-Val
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 3:31 AM Вячеслав Коптилин
wrote:
> Hello Igniters,
>
> IMHO, this is not a good idea to change the behavior of serviceProxy()
> depending on statistics (enabled/disabled). It seems counterintuitive to
> me.
> Per
Hi, guys!
> this is not a good idea to change the behavior of serviceProxy()
depending on statistics
I think that the patch doesn't change the behavior of `serviceProxy()`.
This method promises a proxy and it actually returns it. The fact that
`serviceProxy()` can return non-proxy objects is an i