Hi!
Thanks all for your comments!
1. I'm OK on the first step to make the indexName param required and not
check fields order for this case. So, I'll remove code with search index by
fields from current PR.
2. But I propose to create a ticket for possible improvement - IndexQuery
should be creat
Folks,
I've recently tried to build the Apache Ignite project from scratch
and got the following error:
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Total
Teamcity will be able to build release — we have caching proxy with Artifactory
which seems has cached that artifact already.
I think I can provide it as a file to republish to mvnrepository, but I have no
such permissions.
Who could help us with uploading it?
> On 27 Aug 2021, at 11:23, Maxim
Hi, ALL!
I'm preparing vote for 2.11 release and tried to start compare with previous
release on TC [1]. Something's gone wrong. Can anyone tell what am I doing
wrong?
[1]
https://ci.ignite.apache.org/buildConfiguration/ApacheIgniteReleaseJava8_IgniteRelease72CheckFileConsistency/6153997
I've found the recommendation to bump up the version SDK [1].
[1]
https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-java/issues/23562#issuecomment-903183704
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 11:27, Petr Ivanov wrote:
>
> Teamcity will be able to build release — we have caching proxy with
> Artifactory which seems h
Hello!
I guess the branch version should be 2.11 and not 2.11.0 since it is called
ignite-2.11
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
пт, 27 авг. 2021 г. в 11:41, Alexey Gidaspov :
> Hi, ALL!
>
> I'm preparing vote for 2.11 release and tried to start compare with
> previous release on TC [1]. Something'
Folks,
I've created an issue to fix this. I think this is a blocker for the
2.11 release since there is no workaround here.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15388
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 11:59, Maxim Muzafarov wrote:
>
> I've found the recommendation to bump up the version SDK [1].
>
Folks,
I've been faced these issues, which seems to be a blocker for the
release. Please, take a look and share your thoughts.
The server node fails when the client node with the higher java
version connects to it [1].
The Apache Ignite build fails with missing dependency [2].
[1] https://issu
I will look into 15388
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021, 18:16 Maxim Muzafarov, wrote:
> Folks,
>
>
> I've been faced these issues, which seems to be a blocker for the
> release. Please, take a look and share your thoughts.
>
> The server node fails when the client node with the higher java
> version connect
Мах, the vote is about to come.
So is it a sufficient reason to downvote release?
Would you cast -1 for RC for that case?
Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov
On 2021/08/27 12:46:24, Maxim Muzafarov wrote:
> Folks,
>
>
> I've been faced these issues, which seems to be a blocker for the
> release. Plea
What is the impact of missing artifact on our users?
The higher java version client was never supported so I'm not really sure
we should block 2.11 because of that
пт, 27 авг. 2021 г. в 15:51, Dmitry Pavlov :
> Мах, the vote is about to come.
>
> So is it a sufficient reason to downvote release?
Dmitry,
We provide the source code distribution as the part of open source
community. The binary distribution is an option. This means that a
user MUST be able to build the binaries from the source code and
currently it's not possible. So, my opinion is IGNITE-15388 is a
blocker for the 2.11 rele
Hi, Maxim!
These issues really block release. So we should wait fixes.
On 2021/08/27 12:46:24, Maxim Muzafarov wrote:
> Folks,
>
>
> I've been faced these issues, which seems to be a blocker for the
> release. Please, take a look and share your thoughts.
>
> The server node fails when the cl
We had a separate discussion with Max and Alex, so I tend to agree that
both issues are blockers.
Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov
пт, 27 авг. 2021 г. в 16:41, Alexey Gidaspov :
> Hi, Maxim!
>
> These issues really block release. So we should wait fixes.
>
> On 2021/08/27 12:46:24, Maxim Muzafarov wro
I guess that Ilya is rigth.
It migth worth to update the instruction a little bit to avoid such questions
(for 2.11 use 2.11; and for 2.11.1 use 2.11.1).
Alexey, WDYT?
On 2021/08/27 09:56:45, Ilya Kasnacheev wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I guess the branch version should be 2.11 and not 2.11.0 since i
15 matches
Mail list logo
