Val.
> But then you said that common sense doesn't work. Code review IS common sense
> for the most part though.
Code review must catch errors like "No validation in the world prevent me from
typing manually "mess" instead of «msg»"
But, when one reviewer prefers `qry` and another requires `qu
Hi,
> Taras, can you, please, describe the features that was implemented in
this merge?
> How users supposed to use them?
> Do we have plans to document?
Sure. Alexander Belyak will describe and file ticket to documentation.
On 23.06.2021 9:27, Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
Hello, Taras.
Thanks fo
Igniters,
Looks like there are no objections and we can accept the proposal.
I will close it tomorrow and move on to the thin client protocol itself.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 12:10 PM Ivan Daschinsky
wrote:
> >> To make it fair. Ignite uses thread-local reusable buffers, see [1].
> I know, but P
Pavel, let me clarify one thing.
1. If this proposal is about binary protocol, then there is no objection I
suppose.
2. If this proposal about serialization of key-value, there are some
uncertainties, especially about complex objects. In this case this proposal
needs more work.
ср, 23 июн. 2021 г
Folks,
Here's the video [1] that explains the proposal in detail.
Feel free to ask questions here.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-i9COU5uAQ (in Russian)
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 2:51 PM Anton Vinogradov wrote:
> Igniters,
> Let me present a framework, we developed, that allows automating
Ivan,
Yes, this proposal is about the binary protocol - the way we serialize
primitive values,
the foundation for the thin client protocol.
Key-value API still has some uncertainty around it, we'll discuss it
separately.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 2:31 PM Ivan Daschinsky wrote:
> Pavel, let me c
Taras,
It is true that we try to minimize dependencies, but there are some anyway.
I think it's perfectly fine to add this library as a dependency.
Will you be able to do this asap? It is surely better than reverting the
commit :)
-Val
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:32 AM Taras Ledkov wrote:
> Hi
Congrats, Anton, that's a valuable contribution! I attended your session at
the Ignite Summit and wonder if you should share that recording with an
English-speaking part of the community?
-
Denis
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 7:37 AM Anton Vinogradov wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Here's the video [1] that expl
AFAIK, it is enough to include mention of this library in NOTICE, please
see here [1][2][3]
[1] -- https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party
[2] -- https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
[3] -- https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
ср, 23 июн. 2021 г. в 17:36, Valent
