[ANNOUNCE] Apache IGNITE python thin client (pyignite) 0.4.0 released

2021-04-22 Thread Ivan Daschinsky
The Apache Ignite Community is pleased to announce the release of Apache IGNITE python thin client (pyignite) 0.4.0. This new release of python thin client contains a lot of changes. Namely: 1. Partition awareness support. 2. Asyncio support. 3. Numerous performance fixes. 4. Numerous bug fixes.

Re: [VOTE][EXTENSION] Release Apache Ignite performance-statistics-ext, spring-data-all-ext and spring-tx-ext extensions 1.0.0 RC1

2021-04-22 Thread Nikita Amelchev
Hi, guys. I have prepared PR to fix module names [1, 2]. Could you take a look and recheck TC integration, please? Note that module names in TC suites should be changed as well. [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite-extensions/pull/58 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14621 чт, 22

Re: [VOTE][EXTENSION] Release Apache Ignite performance-statistics-ext, spring-data-all-ext and spring-tx-ext extensions 1.0.0 RC1

2021-04-22 Thread Petr Ivanov
Looks good. What suites are in question, these ones [1]? [1] https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project/IgniteExtensions_Tests > On 22 Apr 2021, at 10:42, Nikita Amelchev wrote: > > Hi, guys. > > I have prepared PR to fix module names [1, 2]. Could you take a look > and recheck TC integration, pl

Re: Apache Ignite 3 / RPM

2021-04-22 Thread Petr Ivanov
Unfortunately, no. However, I think I'll update the package to better resemble with current binary archive prepared for alpha2 and update release task. Due to Bintray closure, I think we can deliver packages as standalone RPM with install instructions. I will update release build anyway, but c

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-14622) Snapshot test simplification

2021-04-22 Thread Anton Vinogradov (Jira)
Anton Vinogradov created IGNITE-14622: - Summary: Snapshot test simplification Key: IGNITE-14622 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14622 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Sub-tas

Re: IP Filtering in IPFinders

2021-04-22 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
Hello! AFAIK, a S3 container, Azure blob container, etc, is a relatively lightweight entity, similar to a table in an SQL database. Why would different clusters need to share the same discovery storage container? When I tested Azure IP finder, it created several blob containers for me on demand, b

Re: IP Filtering in IPFinders

2021-04-22 Thread Atri Sharma
Hello! I actually saw the shared container scenario being tried by somebody who wanted an external script to monitor all IPs being used by his clusters and hence thought of this idea. Another thing that came in was the Firewall blocking a few IP addresses, hence the idea. I feel that the footprin

Re: IP Filtering in IPFinders

2021-04-22 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
Hello! I'm still not fully convinced, but Val's approach sounds rational to me. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev чт, 22 апр. 2021 г. в 12:45, Atri Sharma : > Hello! > > I actually saw the shared container scenario being tried by somebody > who wanted an external script to monitor all IPs being use

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-14623) Calcite. Sort out test scripts at: sql/aggregate/aggregates/*

2021-04-22 Thread Taras Ledkov (Jira)
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-14623: - Summary: Calcite. Sort out test scripts at: sql/aggregate/aggregates/* Key: IGNITE-14623 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14623 Project: Ignite

Empty test results for Security Test Suite ran against master branch on Team City

2021-04-22 Thread Shishkov Ilya
Hello, Igniters! As I see, there are no test results for Security Test Suite run against 'master' branch [1], for 'ignite-2.10' Security tests results are present as expected [2]. Is this situation correct? 1. https://ci.ignite.apache.org/buildConfiguration/IgniteTests24Java8_Security/5977426?bui

Re: Empty test results for Security Test Suite ran against master branch on Team City

2021-04-22 Thread Dmitry Pavlov
Hi, I guess it 's not correct since master tests count is 0. No reason to run a suite without tests. Folks, why it could be the case? I've checked SUITE_NAME and suite in the code and it seems to be mached. Sincerely, Dmitriy Pavlov On 2021/04/22 14:29:37, Shishkov Ilya wrote: > Hello, Igni

Re: Stop sending IGNITE Created e-mails to dev@

2021-04-22 Thread Ivan Pavlukhin
> All issues notifications are also sent to iss...@ignite.apache.org so one can > subscribe to this list in order to track the created tickets. Does not sound as useful advice. Issues list [1] looks like real scrapyard, I doubt that it can be usable for anyone in current flavor. Can we send only

Re: Stop sending IGNITE Created e-mails to dev@

2021-04-22 Thread Dmitriy Pavlov
+1 for issues -1 for TC bot. For the latter I siggest improving analysis to avoid odd emails and leave only relevant чт, 22 апр. 2021 г., 18:16 Ivan Pavlukhin : > > All issues notifications are also sent to iss...@ignite.apache.org so > one can subscribe to this list in order to track the created

Re: Review for IGNITE-13112 The current security context should be obtained using the IgniteSecurity interface only.

2021-04-22 Thread Denis Garus
Maksim, ok. Let me know if you have any questions. ср, 21 апр. 2021 г. в 17:51, Maksim Stepachev : > Please wait. I'm watching your review. > > вт, 6 апр. 2021 г. в 20:14, Denis Garus : > > > Hello, Igniters! > > > > I've raised the PR [1] for the issue [2]. > > Could somebody review it? > > > >

[DISCUSSION] Documentation of thin clients (python, php, nodejs)

2021-04-22 Thread Ivan Daschinsky
Igniters, there are some questions regarding the documentation state of thin clients. Recently, we have released pyignite 0.4.0. Traditionally, documentation for python thin client is autogenerated from source and contains in the same git repository, as the client itself. Documentation is autogene