+1 (binding)
Started .NET nodes and examples, installed NuGet packages and started
Ignite from there
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 11:28 PM Ilya Kasnacheev
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> 0 (binding)
>
> I have checked deb package, built and run C++, ran dotnet example and
> sqlline.
>
> It is unfortunate that w
Ivan,
I agree with you that the more members will check the release the
better will be. That's why I've shared the release candidate links [1]
before starting a vote. The best time for starting a vote is not
mentioned at our release wiki page [2] (should we?) and I've also
failed with googling th
+1 (binding)
Downloaded binary distribution archive, launched a cluster of 2 nodes,
created/filled/queried a table using sqlline.
A couple of minor problems along the way (nothing critical to block
the release):
1. Shell scripts in bin directory (ignite.sh, sqlline.sh, etc.) have
no "execute" per
Hi, Igniters, I've finished the ML documentation.
I have the issue that, for example I've created a new version of page with
postfix -2.8 and the page name contains this postfix.
How are we going to replace the URL? Or we will replace the content from
initial page?
For example, I've created the n
Hi, i need contributors permissions :)
Vladimir, Slava,
In general, I like the idea of abstracting the service deployment from its
usage, but there are some backward-compatibility considerations that won't
let us do so.
Or we can declare usage of services without interfaces incorrect
I don't think we can introduce a requirement for
Hi Dmitry,
Welcome to Apache Ignite Community!
Please share your Jira username to add to contributors.
Meanwhile you can check this page out for commonly asked questions
pertaining to the contribution process:
https://ignite.apache.org/community/contribute.html
Best regards,
Ivan Pavlukhin
вс,
Vishnu Bharathi created IGNITE-12731:
Summary: Support expiry policy at a key value level for the thin
clients
Key: IGNITE-12731
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12731
Project: Ig
Hi Ivan/Denis,
Are you saying that when a value is loaded to cache from an underlying
storage using read-through approach, value is loaded only on primary node
and does not get replicated on its back nodes?
I am under the impression that when a value is loaded in a cache using
read-through approa
