Stepan Pilschikov created IGNITE-12657:
--
Summary: ML examples EvaluatorExample and MultipleMetricsExample
looks the same
Key: IGNITE-12657
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12657
Hi, Alexey, could you please looking on one small accident happen in ML
examples:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12657 - 2 examples exactly the
same.
Also want to say that all previous examples have one common approach for
meaningful output, like ">>> Something important". In this tw
Thank you so much, will fix it next week
вт, 11 февр. 2020 г., 11:33 Stepan Pilschikov (Jira) :
> Stepan Pilschikov created IGNITE-12657:
> --
>
> Summary: ML examples EvaluatorExample and
> MultipleMetricsExample looks the same
>
Great, thank you so much, will fix next week
вт, 11 февр. 2020 г., 11:39 Stepan Pilschikov :
> Hi, Alexey, could you please looking on one small accident happen in ML
> examples:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12657 - 2 examples exactly
> the same.
>
> Also want to say that all pr
Stepan Pilschikov created IGNITE-12658:
--
Summary: [ML][Examples] TutorialStepByStepExample failed on
cluster with more then 1 node
Key: IGNITE-12658
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12658
-1 Prohibit
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 11:02 AM Alexey Goncharuk wrote:
>
> Dear Apache Ignite community,
>
> We would like to conduct a formal vote on the subject of whether to allow
> or prohibit a joint existence of @deprecated annotation for an old API
> and @IgniteExperimental [1] for a new (re
And one more
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12658 -
TutorialStepByStepExample example failed if cluster with more then 1 node
вт, 11 февр. 2020 г. в 11:52, Alexey Zinoviev :
> Great, thank you so much, will fix next week
>
> вт, 11 февр. 2020 г., 11:39 Stepan Pilschikov :
>
>> Hi, A
Hello Igniters,
I'd like to add one more fix to the release: [1]
It adds versioning to internal classes of distributed metastorage component.
Without this fix it would be much harder to update these classes without
breaking binary compatibility.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12
Alexey Zinoviev created IGNITE-12659:
Summary: [ML] Remove broken sub-modules in ML
Key: IGNITE-12659
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12659
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: B
Alexey Zinoviev created IGNITE-12660:
Summary: [ML] The ParamGrid uses unserialized lambdas in interface
to get an access to the trainer fields
Key: IGNITE-12660
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNI
Igniters,
Current the 2.8 release status
1. The PR with RELEASE_NOTES fully updated [1].
2. Previously mentioned performance drop has not been confirmed. Run
many times in different environments. All test results within the
margin of error.
In-memory, putAll, 4 nodes, 1 client
IgnitePutAllBenc
Hello, Igniters
Stepan found and reported bug related to lambda
serialization/deserialization
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12657
The problem is the next: the ParamGrid object has a lambda in interface and
this is an very bad for ML component, I've created a blocker bug
https://issu
Ilya Kasnacheev created IGNITE-12661:
Summary: Fix GridIoManagerSelfTest
Key: IGNITE-12661
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12661
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Test
Fixed both in release branch 2.8. Please verify and let me know
вт, 11 февр. 2020 г. в 14:58, Stepan Pilschikov :
> And one more
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12658 -
> TutorialStepByStepExample example failed if cluster with more then 1 node
>
> вт, 11 февр. 2020 г. в 11:52, Ale
All ML bugs are fixed, tested on TC and merged to 2.8 release branch.
Hope I'm not a blocker man now.
вт, 11 февр. 2020 г. в 17:23, Alexey Zinoviev :
> Hello, Igniters
>
> Stepan found and reported bug related to lambda
> serialization/deserialization
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGN
Alexey,
Is the approach when we cherry-pick fixes to the 2.8 only after all
fixes have verified in the master branch better? I just want to be
sure the release branch to be stable enough.
On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 18:36, Alexey Zinoviev wrote:
>
> Fixed both in release branch 2.8. Please verify and
Hi, Igniters!
I've prepared the PR[1] for the ticket[2], could somebody do a review?
Thanks.
1. https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7338
2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12344
Sorry, for that, but I it touches ML-related stuff only and doesn't
influence on any another module.
I merged them to master later (currently, I have a 4 tickets in a queue).
Will keep in mind for the next fixes
вт, 11 февр. 2020 г. в 18:58, Maxim Muzafarov :
> Alexey,
>
> Is the approach when w
Hi Alexey,
I think we can release for spring boot autoconfigure module.
Nikolay - Do you have tentative timeline when you are planning for release
of spring boot autoconfigure module.
After that we are planning to make release for flink ext.
Since, each module are independent so they will be
Hi,
Can someone please help in review for these following PRs. I have
received approval for release process from Alexey and would need a code
review approval for following PR.
Jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12361
PR https://github.com/apache/ignite-extensions/pull/4
http
Hello,
Can someone please help in review for these following PRs. I have
received approval for release process from Alexey and would need a code
review approval for following PR.
Jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12358
PR https://github.com/apache/ignite-extensions/pull/5
h
21 matches
Mail list logo
