Re: Launched Ignite meetups and redesigned events pages

2020-01-09 Thread Dmitriy Pavlov
Hi Igniters, Mauricio, Ignacio, and Denis, Thank you all for updating these pages. I would like to stress just one thing: should you have in mind some topic you can run talk about, please feel absolutely free to fill submission proposal. To submit proposal you need to fill in this form https://d

[ANNOUNCE] New Apache Ignite PMC member: Saikat Maitra

2020-01-09 Thread Dmitriy Pavlov
Hello Ignite Community, The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Ignite has invited Saikat Maitra to join the PMC as a new member and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Saikat joined the community a long time ago and earned the role of a committer by integrating Ignite

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache Ignite PMC member: Saikat Maitra

2020-01-09 Thread Ivan Pavlukhin
Saikat, Congratulations and many thanks for your efforts! чт, 9 янв. 2020 г. в 13:20, Dmitriy Pavlov : > > Hello Ignite Community, > > > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Ignite has invited Saikat > Maitra to join the PMC as a new member and we are pleased to announce that > he

Re: Partition reserve/release asymmetry

2020-01-09 Thread Alexey Goncharuk
Hello Anton, Thanks for digging into this. The logic with checking the reservations count seems fishy to me as well, so I have no objections with the suggested change. This "if" statement does not answer why the partition was being destroyed during the commit, though. Does the issue reproduce in s

Re: How to use spark-2.4 module in Ignite 2.8?

2020-01-09 Thread Alexey Zinoviev
Hi, I've found a bug in pom. It will be fixed on next week in master and release branches. Thank for the message! ср, 18 дек. 2019 г. в 22:11, Denis Magda : > Alexey, Nikolay, > > Could you please step in and shed some light on what has changed with > Spark? Probably, that's an issue that needs t

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

2020-01-09 Thread Ivan Rakov
Maxim M. and anyone who is interested, I suggest to include this fix to 2.8 release: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12225 Basically, it's a result of the following discussion: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-Single-point-in-API-for-changing-cluster-st

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

2020-01-09 Thread Ivan Pavlukhin
+1 чт, 9 янв. 2020 г. в 16:38, Ivan Rakov : > > Maxim M. and anyone who is interested, > > I suggest to include this fix to 2.8 release: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12225 > Basically, it's a result of the following discussion: > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.

Hint for user that baseline topology should be changed in order to trigger rebalance

2020-01-09 Thread Ivan Rakov
Folks, Since 2.4, Ignite cluster requires baseline topology in persistent mode. That means if user wants to scale cluster and add more nodes, data won't be redistributed among the whole node set until manual call of IgniteCluster#setBaselineTopology. Surely this behavior is well-documented, but d

Re: Hint for user that baseline topology should be changed in order to trigger rebalance

2020-01-09 Thread Вячеслав Коптилин
Hello, I think, log > message with something like "Current set of nodes differs from baseline > topology, please call XXX in order to trigger rebalance and redistribute > your data" will make the situation a bit more transparent. Yes, this seems reasonable to me when the baseline auto-adjust feat

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12522) Extend test coverage [IGNITE-12104] Check deployment from cache before to load it from local or version storage

2020-01-09 Thread Vladislav Pyatkov (Jira)
Vladislav Pyatkov created IGNITE-12522: -- Summary: Extend test coverage [IGNITE-12104] Check deployment from cache before to load it from local or version storage Key: IGNITE-12522 URL: https://issues.apache.o

Re: Improve logging of Data Region configuration

2020-01-09 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
Hello again! TC passes, review is ready. Your last chance to act before merge! Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev вт, 31 дек. 2019 г. в 16:01, Ilya Kasnacheev : > Hello! > > I have prepared a patch, please review. It will look like this: > > Data Regions Started: 4 > ^-- sysMemPlc region [typ

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12523) Continuously generated thread dumps in failure processor slow down the whole system

2020-01-09 Thread Andrey N. Gura (Jira)
Andrey N. Gura created IGNITE-12523: --- Summary: Continuously generated thread dumps in failure processor slow down the whole system Key: IGNITE-12523 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12523

Re: Hint for user that baseline topology should be changed in order to trigger rebalance

2020-01-09 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
Hello! Can we perhaps add this as a blocker to 2.8? Perhaps by correlating with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12504 Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev чт, 9 янв. 2020 г. в 17:59, Вячеслав Коптилин : > Hello, > > I think, log > > message with something like "Current set of nodes diffe

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

2020-01-09 Thread Sergey Antonov
+1 I'm preparing patch for 2.8 branch now. TC Bot visa for 2.8 branch will be at 13 Jan чт, 9 янв. 2020 г., 21:06 Ivan Pavlukhin : > +1 > > чт, 9 янв. 2020 г. в 16:38, Ivan Rakov : > > > > Maxim M. and anyone who is interested, > > > > I suggest to include this fix to 2.8 release: > > https://is

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

2020-01-09 Thread Alexey Zinoviev
+1 чт, 9 янв. 2020 г. в 18:52, Sergey Antonov : > +1 > > I'm preparing patch for 2.8 branch now. TC Bot visa for 2.8 branch will be > at 13 Jan > > чт, 9 янв. 2020 г., 21:06 Ivan Pavlukhin : > > > +1 > > > > чт, 9 янв. 2020 г. в 16:38, Ivan Rakov : > > > > > > Maxim M. and anyone who is intereste

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

2020-01-09 Thread Maxim Muzafarov
Folks, Let me remind you that we are working on the 2.8 release branch stabilization currently (please, keep it in mind). Do we have a really STRONG reason for adding such a change [1] to the ignite-2.8 branch? This PR [2] doesn't look a very simple +5,517 −2,038, 111 files changed. Do we have

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache Ignite PMC member: Saikat Maitra

2020-01-09 Thread Denis Magda
Congrats, Saikat! Well deserved! - Denis On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 2:22 AM Ivan Pavlukhin wrote: > Saikat, > > Congratulations and many thanks for your efforts! > > чт, 9 янв. 2020 г. в 13:20, Dmitriy Pavlov : > > > > Hello Ignite Community, > > > > > > > > The Project Management Committee (PMC)

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

2020-01-09 Thread Alexey Zinoviev
Agree, that we could plan 2.8.1 for bug-fixing and 2.9 for new major changes and maybe it will help Ivan to decide move it to next releases. Agree that scope is frozen, agree that it makes the release is hard for our release manager. чт, 9 янв. 2020 г. в 19:38, Maxim Muzafarov : > Folks, > > > L

Re: Ignite Evolution Direction: short questionary

2020-01-09 Thread Denis Magda
Ignite dev community, I've closed the questionary and here is raw anonymous data for your reference: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Rkc82GkNlsVrwXxQgFd8RgFNV_qVwuMhmzaQV2W9ccI/edit?usp=sharing Overall, Ignite is continued to be used heavely for caching scenarios (services, DBs, APIs) with in

Ignite and Pauseless JVMs for Low-Latency Scenarious: Meetup with Azul

2020-01-09 Thread Denis Magda
Igniters, Some of you should have come across an article by Simon Ritter describing how Ignite and Azul Zing JVM are used together to power low-latency use cases: https://www.azul.com/igniting-in-memory-performance-with-gridgain-and-zing/ Several of our community members including Pavel Vinokurov

Re: Hint for user that baseline topology should be changed in order to trigger rebalance

2020-01-09 Thread Denis Magda
Ivan, Igniters, thanks for starting the discussion, How about the following a bit simplified message template? It's assumed the user is aware of what both rebalancing and baseline topology mean. "New server node joined the cluster, add it to the baseline topology manually to trigger data rebalanc

Re: Launched Ignite meetups and redesigned events pages

2020-01-09 Thread Denis Magda
Dmitry, We've also added the reference to the form on the event's webpage. Btw, could you remind me who will be receiving the proposals - you, I and some other folks or all @dev list? - Denis On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 1:53 AM Dmitriy Pavlov wrote: > Hi Igniters, Mauricio, Ignacio, and Denis, > >

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

2020-01-09 Thread Sergey Antonov
Hello, Maxim! > This PR [2] doesn't look a very simple +5,517 −2,038, 111 files changed. Yes, PR is huge, but I wrote a lot of new tests and reworked already presented. Changes in product code are minimal - only 30 changed files in /src/main/ part. And most of them are new control.sh commands and

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache Ignite PMC member: Saikat Maitra

2020-01-09 Thread Saikat Maitra
Hi Dmitriy, Denis, Ivan, Thank you so much. I am very glad and excited to be a part of Apache Ignite Project Member Committee. I will try my best to assist with project management and guide the direction of the project. Regards, Saikat On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 10:51 AM Denis Magda wrote: > Cong

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12524) Partition reserve/release symmetry should be checked on release/destroy

2020-01-09 Thread Anton Vinogradov (Jira)
Anton Vinogradov created IGNITE-12524: - Summary: Partition reserve/release symmetry should be checked on release/destroy Key: IGNITE-12524 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12524 P

[MTCGA]: new failures in builds [4914299] needs to be handled

2020-01-09 Thread dpavlov . tasks
Hi Igniters, I've detected some new issue on TeamCity to be handled. You are more than welcomed to help. If your changes can lead to this failure(s): We're grateful that you were a volunteer to make the contribution to this project, but things change and you may no longer be able to finalize

Re: Partition reserve/release asymmetry

2020-01-09 Thread Anton Vinogradov
>> Does the issue reproduce in >> subsequent runs? Unfortunately no. We performed 30+ runs without "success". >> I think we can add an assertion to >> GridDhtLocalPartition#destroy() method to check that reservations is 0 Ok, I will check and merge in case of success. Created the Issue to handle t

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

2020-01-09 Thread Николай Ижиков
Hello, Igniters. I’m -1 to include the read-only patch to 2.8. I think we shouldn’t accept any patches to 2.8 except bug fixes for blockers and major issues. Guys, we don’t release Apache Ignite for 13 months! We should focus on the release and make it ASAP. We can’t extend the scope anymore.

Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

2020-01-09 Thread Zhenya Stanilovsky
Agree with Nikolay, -1 from me, too.   >Hello, Igniters. > >I’m -1 to include the read-only patch to 2.8. >I think we shouldn’t accept any patches to 2.8 except bug fixes for blockers >and major issues. > >Guys, we don’t release Apache Ignite for 13 months! >We should focus on the release and ma