Hi Steve,
I am afraid that window functions and OVER keyword will not work
properly in new Ignite version with upgraded H2. Could you share some
simple query with OVER keyword you are going to execute? Then I can
check it against current master version.
чт, 17 окт. 2019 г. в 14:44, steve.hostett.
A folow-up, there is an interesting ticket [1]. Need to check if
window functions are covered.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7664
пт, 18 окт. 2019 г. в 10:01, Ivan Pavlukhin :
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> I am afraid that window functions and OVER keyword will not work
> properly in new I
Great job,
I think we should have details like this in documentation, not only in wiki
Denis, what do you think?
Best Regards,
Igor
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 7:19 PM Ivan Pavlukhin wrote:
> Sergey,
>
> Thank you for a review!
>
> > It seems to me that document tries to focus on details of the
Surkov Aleksandr created IGNITE-12303:
-
Summary: Change comment for an enumeration item CACHE_DESTROY
Key: IGNITE-12303
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12303
Project: Ignite
Hello, Nikita.
Thank you.
I will take a look. shortly.
чт, 17 окт. 2019 г. в 18:23, Maxim Muzafarov :
> Nikita,
>
> > Can we include it into a 2.8 release scope?
> I think it is possible since the release scope freeze date has not
> happened yet.
>
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 17:36, Nikita Amelche
Igniters,
I would like to add WithExpirePolicy support to thin clients. [1]
For a thick client, we can obtain a reference to a cache wrapper instance and
use cache API through it. At the same time, the thin client protocol is
stateless, we do not hold a reference to a cache but rather a cache na
Alex, Igniters,
Who of us was contributing this feature? I don’t see any documentation, not
clear how the users are expected to benefit from the capability and how
everybody will be aware of the feature existence.
We need to close the gap and spread the word.
Denis
On Thursday, October 17, 2019
Denis, AFAIK we doesn't have documentation for the SQL System Views existing in
Ignite.
I have plans to write a documentation about metrics and syste views that will
cover SQL System View.
It will be available till 2.8 release.
В Пт, 18/10/2019 в 07:16 -0700, Denis Magda пишет:
> Alex, Ignite
Documentation for views released in 2.7 is here:
https://apacheignite-sql.readme.io/docs/system-views
пт, 18 окт. 2019 г. в 17:24, Nikolay Izhikov :
> Denis, AFAIK we doesn't have documentation for the SQL System Views
> existing in Ignite.
>
> I have plans to write a documentation about metrics
Stateless approach looks a lot better to me.
We have a choice:
* Keep expiry policy on server and send an ID with every request (like a
query cursor ID - 8 bytes)
* Send full expiry policy with every expiry-enabled request (24 bytes - or
maybe less? We should think about the format)
Stateful appr
Pavel,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
Right now I see that 2 reserved bytes come with every cache request: cacheId
and flags.
The first one is obvious, but the second one is used only for java thin client
with enabled KeepBinary mode.
I think we could use the flags byte and write an exp
Alex, Nikolay, thanks! Forgive me for my poor googling skills ;)
-
Denis
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 7:26 AM Alex Plehanov
wrote:
> Documentation for views released in 2.7 is here:
> https://apacheignite-sql.readme.io/docs/system-views
>
> пт, 18 окт. 2019 г. в 17:24, Nikolay Izhikov :
>
> > Denis
Hello Denis,
Sure, sounds good. I will create a separate discussion thread to get
community feedback on whether we
should join the Bahir or kick-off "Ignite Extensions" project.
Regards,
Saikat
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 2:21 PM Denis Magda wrote:
> Folks,
>
> The concept of Apache Bahir is preci
Hello,
We wanted to discuss on a proposal to move and support the Apache Ignite
integrations as separate Ignite Extensions as discussed here
http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Pub-Sub-Streamer-Implementation-td43944.html
.
The reason we wanted to move our Apache Ignite
14 matches
Mail list logo
