Re: Apache Ignite 2.7 release

Hello, guys. I moved SG tasks to 2.8. В Сб, 29/09/2018 в 17:11 +0300, Vladimir Ozerov пишет: > I fully support Dmitry's concerns. I do not see a single chance for Service > Grid to be included into 2.7 scope, but we are still keeping hope alive. > What for? Our experience shows, that any feature

Re: Danger (?) change of DiscoveryCustomEvent in GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture#onDone

I think that I understand a reason for doing this: The most custom events which handle in 'GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture' are using only in PME flow and reason is release them for GC as soon as possible. But there are some other systems which can listen to the same events, for example, to perfor

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9743) Fix broken link to DML example on https://ignite.apache.org/features/sql.html

Sergey Antonov created IGNITE-9743: -- Summary: Fix broken link to DML example on https://ignite.apache.org/features/sql.html Key: IGNITE-9743 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9743 Pro

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9744) Fix SYSTEM_WORKER_TERMINATION detection in general case

Andrey Kuznetsov created IGNITE-9744: Summary: Fix SYSTEM_WORKER_TERMINATION detection in general case Key: IGNITE-9744 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9744 Project: Ignite

Re: [ML] IGNITE-9282 Naive Bayes task split

Hi Ravil, I think this is a good idea. I prefer to have several small single-feature tickets instead of a big one with several features. I will start reviewing 9282 on this week. Also, I looking forward to seeing those new tickets. Regards, Yuriy вс, 30 сент. 2018 г. в 3:58, Ravil Galeyev : >

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4876: Ignite 9744

GitHub user andrey-kuznetsov opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4876 Ignite 9744 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/andrey-kuznetsov/ignite ignite-9744 Alternatively you can review and appl

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9745) [ML] Add Multinomial Naive Bayes

Ravil Galeyev created IGNITE-9745: - Summary: [ML] Add Multinomial Naive Bayes Key: IGNITE-9745 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9745 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Sub-task

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9746) [ML] Add Complement Naive Bayes

Ravil Galeyev created IGNITE-9746: - Summary: [ML] Add Complement Naive Bayes Key: IGNITE-9746 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9746 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Sub-task

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9747) [ML] Add Bernoulli Naive Bayes classifier

Ravil Galeyev created IGNITE-9747: - Summary: [ML] Add Bernoulli Naive Bayes classifier Key: IGNITE-9747 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9747 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Sub-

Re: [ML] IGNITE-9282 Naive Bayes task split

Hi Yuriy, I created new tickets for other Bayes classifiers IGNITE-9745 Multinomial Naive Bayes IGNITE-9746 Complement Naive Bayes IGNITE-9747

ComplexObjects via REST API?

Igniters, Is there a way to put user defined objects (in BinaryObject or whatever another format) via the REST APIs [1]? According to the docs it's not supported, but I wonder if by any chance it's implemented somewhere and is just not officially released yet... Thanks, Pavel [1] https://apachei

Re: Request for review : IGNITE-3303 Apache Flink Integration - Flink source

Hi Alex, Nicolay As discussed with Andrew the changes looks good. Would it be ok to merge this change to master considering the 2.7 release plan? Regards, Saikat On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 7:15 PM Saikat Maitra wrote: > Thank you Andrew > > Regards, > Saikat > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 7:00 PM An

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9748) Web console: Add possibility to configure distributed MVCC

Vasiliy Sisko created IGNITE-9748: - Summary: Web console: Add possibility to configure distributed MVCC Key: IGNITE-9748 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9748 Project: Ignite

Re: ComplexObjects via REST API?

Hello! Yes, this is supported. REST API will convert complex BinaryObjects into REST by default. But to put such objects via REST you will need to define your own ConnectorMessageInterceptor and plug it in. You will need to define string to entity mapping in onReceive. You can leave onSend returni

Re: ComplexObjects via REST API?

Thanks, Ilya. > REST API will convert complex BinaryObjects into REST by default You mean "into JSON"? Is this documented anywhere? Any examples that you can share a link to? P. On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 10:06 PM Ilya Kasnacheev wrote: > Hello! > > Yes, this is supported. REST API will convert