[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4411) Deadlock with striped pool

Yakov Zhdanov created IGNITE-4411: - Summary: Deadlock with striped pool Key: IGNITE-4411 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4411 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug Compo

Re: Batch DML queries design discussion

Dima, I would like to point out that data streamer support had already been implemented in the course of work on DML in 1.8 exactly as you are suggesting now (turned on via connection flag; allowed only MERGE — data streamer can't do putIfAbsent stuff, right?; absolutely no relation w/JDBC), *but*

Re: Batch DML queries design discussion

Sorry, "no relation w/JDBC" in my previous message should read "no relation w/JDBC batching". — Alex 10 дек. 2016 г. 1:52 PM пользователь "Alexander Paschenko" < alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com> написал: > Dima, > > I would like to point out that data streamer support had already been > implement

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.8.0 Release (RC1)

Hi: http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/ignite the site above, not updated? 在 2016/12/9 22:06, Sergey Kozlov 写道: Hi Maven repository has been released. https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/ignite/ On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 4:41 PM, 李玉珏@163 <186240

IGNITE-3727： why did not merge into the 1.8 version?

Hi： IGNITE-3727,this issue has been fixed and tested in september，why did not merge into the 1.8 version?

Re: affinityCall in one distributed transaction

For example: 1) Front-end sends a request to perform a complex transaction. 2) Some application (like a business transactional coordinator) receives message via asynchronous transport. This application implements logic of calling different services sequentially or in parallel via asynchronous trans

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.8.0 Release (RC1)

Well, thanks for pointing out to this. Sergey, looks like you missed something at some releasing phase. If I create a project from 1.8 examples then Maven can’t locate binaries for 1.8.0. Please fix this ASAP. — Denis > On Dec 10, 2016, at 3:57 AM, 李玉珏@163 <18624049...@163.com> wrote: > > Hi

Re: IGNITE-3727： why did not merge into the 1.8 version?

Hi, It was released in 1.8. I’ve just checked git logs. How did you come up with such a conclusion? Something doesn't work on your side? — Denis > On Dec 10, 2016, at 5:39 AM, 李玉珏@163 <18624049...@163.com> wrote: > > Hi： > > > IGNITE-3727,this issue has been fixed and tested in september，why

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.8.0 Release (RC1)

Created an INFRA ticket to double check that this is not an infrastructure issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13073 > Sergey,

[VOTE] Apche Ignite PMC Chair Election

According to the discussion on the dev list [1], the following candidates were proposed for the Apache Ignite PMC Chair position: Vladimir Ozerov Konstantin Boudnik Valentin Kulichenko Denis Magda Branko Čibej The vote is taking place on the dev list, however only votes from Apache Ignite PM

Re: affinityCall in one distributed transaction

Anton, Thanks for the explanation. I am sorry to keep asking questions on this. Can you change your example to include concrete Ignite calls on Compute or Cache APIs (or other APIs)? I am still struggling to understand the boundaries between business and Ignite logic. D. On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at

Re: Batch DML queries design discussion

Alex, It seams to me that replace semantic can be implemented with StreamReceiver, no? D. On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Alexander Paschenko < alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry, "no relation w/JDBC" in my previous message should read "no relation > w/JDBC batching". > > — Alex >

Re: affinityCall in one distributed transaction

Dmitriy, it's ok To be abstract simple business transaction for execution payment (preparation done before) from the card looks like: 1) Create a payment document (cache API); 2) Write-off funds from the payer's card; 2.1) Change in register #1 (cache API); 2.2) Change in register #2 (cache API);

Re: IGNITE-3727： why did not merge into the 1.8 version?

Denis， I found the branch 3727: https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite/tree/ignite-3727-2 But it appear that the code is not merged into the master? for example, IgniteMessagingImpl.java,the related code is still an old version,8 months ago. 在 2016/12/10 22:56, Denis Magda 写道: Hi, It

Re: IGNITE-3727： why did not merge into the 1.8 version?

Alright, looks like I confused it with some other task initially. The ticket you’re talking about is still under review and looks abandoned https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3727 Dmitriy G., Sam, is the ticket ready for the merge?

Re: Support for Spark 2.0

Upgraded Ignite Spark module to the latest Spark version. The transition was trivial. However, I couldn’t fully execute Spark’s the test suite on TeamCity due to some maven dependency related issue. The issue never happens on my local machine. Anton V., please have a look at it and suggest how