Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-2970:
--
Summary: .NET: CompiledQuery fails with embedded const parameters
Key: IGNITE-2970
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2970
Project: Ignite
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/626
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/627
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
GitHub user ptupitsyn opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/629
IGNITE-2970 .NET: Fix CompiledQuery parameter validation
All CompiledQuery parameters must come from the enclosing func arguments.
Constants are not allowed. There was a shortcut for zero and o
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/595
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/599
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/596
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/598
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/629
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
I think Anton V can help here. Anton, can you please take a look and remove
releases prior to 1.5.final?
--Yakov
2016-04-08 15:07 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda :
> Igniters,
>
> Who can handle this?
>
> --
> Denis
>
>
>
> Forwarded Message
> Subject:[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-296
GitHub user ptupitsyn opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/630
IGNITE-2967 .NET: Provide meaningful error message when platform fails on
Java-only node
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ptup
Artem Shutak created IGNITE-2971:
Summary: Assertion error inside OPTIMISTIC SERIALIZABLE tx on 'get'
Key: IGNITE-2971
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2971
Project: Ignite
I
Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-2972:
--
Summary: .NET: CacheQueriesTest.TestSqlQueryLocal fails
sporadically on TC
Key: IGNITE-2972
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2972
Project: Ignite
Artem Shutak created IGNITE-2973:
Summary: CacheInterceptor gets mixed user and binary objects in
case of 'withKeepBinary' cache and EntryProcessor which sets user object as a
value
Key: IGNITE-2973
URL: https://
Vladimir Ozerov created IGNITE-2974:
---
Summary: ODBC: Implement fine-grained NIO server configuration.
Key: IGNITE-2974
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2974
Project: Ignite
Igniters,
We have several public components which use *GridNioServer* internally. NIO
server has several properties for fine tuning. Selector count, direct
buffer flag, max queue size, send/receive buffer sizes, etc..
And in every public component we have separate getters/setters to pass
values t
GitHub user ascherbakoff opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/631
IGNITE-2941
IGNITE-2941
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ascherbakoff/ignite ignite-2941
Alternatively you can review and ap
GitHub user avinogradovgg opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/632
7.5.12
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-7.5.12
Alternatively you can review and apply these
GitHub user ptupitsyn opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/633
IGNITE-2972 .NET: Fix CacheQueriesTest.TestSqlQueryLocal sporadic failure
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ptupitsyn/ignite ign
Vlad, I did not have time today. Will review tomorrow.
--Yakov
2016-04-08 13:51 GMT+03:00 Yakov Zhdanov :
> Very good news, Vlad! I will take a look over weekend or on Monday.
>
> --Yakov
>
> 2016-04-08 12:58 GMT+03:00 Vladisav Jelisavcic :
>
>> Yakov,
>>
>> sorry for the long delay, I added ano
GitHub user agoncharuk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/634
IGNITE-2954 - Added tests for various read-through scenarios
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/agoncharuk/ignite ignite-2954
A
Hello engineers,
I have added documentation on readme.io for Deployment Modes[1] and
Resource Injection[2]. Can some one please review the content and verify
its correctness?
Currently these pages are hidden/private, and will not show up on the
sidebar. Once reviewed, you ( or I) can make it publi
Valentin Kulichenko created IGNITE-2975:
---
Summary: Load balancer does not survive client reconnect
Key: IGNITE-2975
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2975
Project: Ignite
Folks,
I tried to switch to Geronimo and it works fine for me. Are we going to
wait for version 1.0, or we're OK with alpha?
-Val
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
wrote:
> Igniters,
>
> Can someone check if the Geronimo JCache jar is the same as the JSR107?
>
>
> http://mvnre
I would say that we are OK with alpha for now, as there is no real
difference between 1.0-alpha and 1.0. We can switch to 1.0 whenever
geronimo project updates the JAR.
D.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Valentin Kulichenko <
valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I tried to switch
25 matches
Mail list logo
