Re: SecurityTestSuite as a separate test suite at TC

2019-08-12 Thread Павлухин Иван
Denis, Perhaps with javassist we can make classes dynamically without use of surefire-fork-count parameters. We already use javassist in ConfigVariationsTestSuiteBuilder#makeTestClass, but for a different purpose. P.S. I did not check it yet. пт, 9 авг. 2019 г. в 14:41, Denis Garus : > > Excuse

Re: SecurityTestSuite as a separate test suite at TC

2019-08-09 Thread Denis Garus
Excuse me! I was wrong. I try to find that parameter on Step 4: Run test suite. One more time, thank you! пт, 9 авг. 2019 г. в 14:05, Petr Ivanov : > Why do you think I did not use it? > > > On 9 Aug 2019, at 13:25, Denis Garus wrote: > > Great! > Could you please add surefire-fork-count-1 to ad

Re: SecurityTestSuite as a separate test suite at TC

2019-08-09 Thread Petr Ivanov
Why do you think I did not use it? > On 9 Aug 2019, at 13:25, Denis Garus wrote: > > Great! > Could you please add surefire-fork-count-1 to additional Maven command line > parameters? > It's crucial. > > Thank you! > > пт, 9 авг. 2019 г. в 12:42, Petr Ivanov >: >

Re: SecurityTestSuite as a separate test suite at TC

2019-08-09 Thread Denis Garus
Great! Could you please add surefire-fork-count-1 to additional Maven command line parameters? It's crucial. Thank you! пт, 9 авг. 2019 г. в 12:42, Petr Ivanov : > Done [1] > > > [1] https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=4482200 > > On 9 Aug 2019, at 12:02, Denis Garus wrote: > > Su

Re: SecurityTestSuite as a separate test suite at TC

2019-08-09 Thread Petr Ivanov
Done [1] [1] https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=4482200 > On 9 Aug 2019, at 12:02, Denis Garus wrote: > > Sure! I created the task [1]. > > Thank you! > > 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12055 > > > пт, 9 а

Re: SecurityTestSuite as a separate test suite at TC

2019-08-09 Thread Denis Garus
Sure! I created the task [1]. Thank you! 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12055 пт, 9 авг. 2019 г. в 11:38, Petr Ivanov : > Hi, Denis! > > > Could file a ticket with description, please? > > On 9 Aug 2019, at 11:35, Denis Garus wrote: > > Thanks all for the feedback! > > I thi

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12055) SecurityTestSuite as a separate test suite at TC

2019-08-09 Thread Denis Garus (JIRA)
Denis Garus created IGNITE-12055: Summary: SecurityTestSuite as a separate test suite at TC Key: IGNITE-12055 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12055 Project: Ignite Issue

Re: SecurityTestSuite as a separate test suite at TC

2019-08-09 Thread Petr Ivanov
Hi, Denis! Could file a ticket with description, please? > On 9 Aug 2019, at 11:35, Denis Garus wrote: > > Thanks all for the feedback! > > I think no one is against of proposal. > > Petr, could you please assist with wit separation of SecurityTestSuite? > > чт, 8 авг. 2019 г. в 14:43, Deni

Re: SecurityTestSuite as a separate test suite at TC

2019-08-09 Thread Denis Garus
Thanks all for the feedback! I think no one is against of proposal. Petr, could you please assist with wit separation of SecurityTestSuite? чт, 8 авг. 2019 г. в 14:43, Denis Garus : > Hello, Ivan! > > >> Could you please provide more details why do we need to run these tests > in forked JVM? >

Re: SecurityTestSuite as a separate test suite at TC

2019-08-08 Thread Denis Garus
Hello, Ivan! >> Could you please provide more details why do we need to run these tests in forked JVM? Surefite documentation [1] says: If forkCount=0, it's impossible to use the system class loader or a plain old Java classpath; we have to use an isolated class loader. When using isolated class

Re: SecurityTestSuite as a separate test suite at TC

2019-08-07 Thread Павлухин Иван
Denis, Could you please provide more details why do we need to run these tests in forked JVM? Still, having separate security suite on TC sounds not bad. ср, 7 авг. 2019 г. в 09:35, Vyacheslav Daradur : > > Hi Denis. > > I think it is fine to extract security tests in a separate build plan on TC

Re: SecurityTestSuite as a separate test suite at TC

2019-08-06 Thread Vyacheslav Daradur
Hi Denis. I think it is fine to extract security tests in a separate build plan on TC. BTW, if you are going to write a lot of Sandbox's tests pay attention to 'extdata' module and an approach of P2P tests (IgniteP2PSelfTestSuite) - this may help you to avoid Maven's classloading issues. On Tue,

SecurityTestSuite as a separate test suite at TC

2019-08-06 Thread Denis Garus
Hello Igniters! I made the test DoPrivelegedOnRemoteNodeTest[1] (SecurityTestSuite) for the task "Sandbox for user-defined code" [2] that uses p2p deploy like the test ServiceHotRedeploymentViaDeploymentSpiTest [3] from IgniteServiceGridTestSuite. That test requires additional Maven command line p