Up.
Would someone please review a PR#2896 for IGNITE-6649 [1]?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6649
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 1:51 AM, Valentin Kulichenko <
valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think it's a big problem. But it would be great if someone better
> experi
I don't think it's a big problem. But it would be great if someone better
experienced in Hadoop stuff chimes in.
-Val
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Andrey Mashenkov <
andrey.mashen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Val,
>
> It doesn't look possible to do without refactoring.
> I've make a PR#2896 [1] wi
Val,
It doesn't look possible to do without refactoring.
I've make a PR#2896 [1] with a fix and want to someone look at it
as I'm not familiar with Hadoop module.
Will it be ok to left it "as is" for now and create a ticket for
refactoring?
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 3:15 AM, Valentin Kulichenko <
Andrey,
Using factory instead of policy instance in configuration makes sense to
me, I think we should do this change.
As for Hadoop module issue, is it possible to do the mentioned validation
after creating the policy? I think that should fix the problem.
-Val
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 7:50 AM A
