Re: .NET Long Running Test execution timeout

2018-03-12 Thread Dmitry Pavlov
Thank you! I'll start the builds later. пн, 12 мар. 2018 г. в 16:23, Pavel Tupitsyn : > Reverted that commit. > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Dmitry Pavlov > wrote: > >> Hi Pavel, >> >> Thanks to Vitaliy Osipov multicast is prohibited on TeamCity agents, >> there should no interference anym

Re: .NET Long Running Test execution timeout

2018-03-12 Thread Pavel Tupitsyn
Reverted that commit. On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Dmitry Pavlov wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > Thanks to Vitaliy Osipov multicast is prohibited on TeamCity agents, there > should no interference anymore. > > Could you please return test to code > (18c6b4a5d079874e9c156fa39564970ad3c31914) > ? > >

Re: .NET Long Running Test execution timeout

2018-03-12 Thread Dmitry Pavlov
Hi Pavel, Thanks to Vitaliy Osipov multicast is prohibited on TeamCity agents, there should no interference anymore. Could you please return test to code (18c6b4a5d079874e9c156fa39564970ad3c31914) ? I'll check if issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7878 is reproducible and close

Re: .NET Long Running Test execution timeout

2018-03-05 Thread Dmitry Pavlov
Hi Pavel, Thank you! Let's wait for fix at TeamCity. Sincerely, Dmitriy Pavlov пн, 5 мар. 2018 г. в 19:09, Pavel Tupitsyn : > Hi Dmitry, > > This test has been there forever. It checks that Ignite can start with > default config. > I think this is quite useful. TeamCity should be fixed to isol

Re: .NET Long Running Test execution timeout

2018-03-05 Thread Pavel Tupitsyn
Hi Dmitry, This test has been there forever. It checks that Ignite can start with default config. I think this is quite useful. TeamCity should be fixed to isolate environments properly. For now I've disabled the test with comment in master branch. Thanks, Pavel On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 5:53 PM

Re: .NET Long Running Test execution timeout

2018-03-05 Thread Igor Sapego
In C++ there are no tests that use TcpDiscoveryMulticastIpFinder. There are examples, though, that use it. As far as I know, currently all examples use TcpDiscoveryMulticastIpFinder, and there were some objections against using VmIpFinder instead. Am I right, folks? Best Regards, Igor On Mon, Ma