Re: [VOTE] Add micronaut dependency to Ignite 3 (reopened)

+1 On 1 Jun 2022, 13:59 +0400, Алексей , wrote: > +1 > > ср, 1 июн. 2022 г. в 12:19, Alexander Lapin : > > > +1 > > > > ср, 1 июн. 2022 г. в 12:14, ткаленко кирилл : > > > > > + 1 > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Add micronaut dependency to Ignite 3 (reopened)

+1 ср, 1 июн. 2022 г. в 12:19, Alexander Lapin : > +1 > > ср, 1 июн. 2022 г. в 12:14, ткаленко кирилл : > > > + 1 > > >

Re: [VOTE] Add micronaut dependency to Ignite 3 (reopened)

+1 Thanks, S. ср, 1 июн. 2022 г. в 12:56, Ilya Korol : > +1 > > 01.06.2022 19:14, ткаленко кирилл пишет: > > + 1 >

Re: [VOTE] Add micronaut dependency to Ignite 3 (reopened)

+1 01.06.2022 19:14, ткаленко кирилл пишет: + 1

Re: [VOTE] Add micronaut dependency to Ignite 3 (reopened)

+1 ср, 1 июн. 2022 г. в 12:14, ткаленко кирилл : > + 1 >

Re:[VOTE] Add micronaut dependency to Ignite 3 (reopened)

+ 1

Re: [VOTE] Add micronaut dependency to Ignite 3 (reopened)

+1 On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 12:03 PM Aleksandr Pakhomov wrote: > Alexander, > > I am not sure that now we can define all > security standards that will be implemented > by Ignite 3. But I can mention the most popular: > OAuth2/OpenId, LDAP. > > I’ve mentioned them in IEP but I believe that > the

Re: [VOTE] Add micronaut dependency to Ignite 3 (reopened)

Alexander, I am not sure that now we can define all security standards that will be implemented by Ignite 3. But I can mention the most popular: OAuth2/OpenId, LDAP. I’ve mentioned them in IEP but I believe that the definite set of security protocols has to be discussed in another IEP. > On 30

Re: [VOTE] Add micronaut dependency to Ignite 3 (reopened)

+1 On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 12:13 PM Alexander Polovtcev wrote: > > Aleksandr, > Thanks for the update, but can you please explain what security > capabilities are planned to be used? Maybe it should be included in the IEP > as well. > > On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 11:03 PM Aleksandr Pakhomov > wrote

Re: [VOTE] Add micronaut dependency to Ignite 3 (reopened)

Aleksandr, Thanks for the update, but can you please explain what security capabilities are planned to be used? Maybe it should be included in the IEP as well. On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 11:03 PM Aleksandr Pakhomov wrote: > Dear community, > > We’ve had a productive discussion about > a micronaut d

Re: [VOTE] Add micronaut dependency to Ignite 3

Andrey, Thank you, I will start a new vote soon. > On 27 May 2022, at 17:29, Andrey Gura wrote: > > Aleksandr, > > please, start a new vote after updating the IEP-87. I think that > Micronaut Security is a good reason for using this framework in the > Apache Ignite. > > > > On Wed, May 25,

Re: [VOTE] Add micronaut dependency to Ignite 3

Aleksandr, please, start a new vote after updating the IEP-87. I think that Micronaut Security is a good reason for using this framework in the Apache Ignite. On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 5:41 PM Andrey Gura wrote: > > -1 (binding) from me. > > Because (if I understood correctly) the main value of

Re: [VOTE] Add micronaut dependency to Ignite 3

-1 (binding) from me. Because (if I understood correctly) the main value of the IEP-87 is the possibility to generate API specification and Swagger annotations is enough for this purpose I don't see reasons for these dependencies. We already have our own controllers for REST-like API's implementat