Re: [DISCUSSION] Java 11 for Ignite 3.0 development

2020-12-10 Thread Pavel Kovalenko
Huge +1 I guess jigsaw, "var" and VarHandle features can really improve the codebase. чт, 10 дек. 2020 г. в 23:41, Vladimir Steshin : > My + for java 11 > > On 08.12.2020 15:00, Nikolay Izhikov wrote: > > +1 for using java 11. > > > >> 8 дек. 2020 г., в 13:18, ткаленко кирилл > написал(а): > >>

Re: [DISCUSSION] Java 11 for Ignite 3.0 development

2020-12-10 Thread Vladimir Steshin
My + for java 11 On 08.12.2020 15:00, Nikolay Izhikov wrote: +1 for using java 11. 8 дек. 2020 г., в 13:18, ткаленко кирилл написал(а): +1 08.12.2020, 12:48, "Philipp Masharov" : Hello! Andrey's arguments are solid. On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:23 PM Pavel Tupitsyn wrote: +1, Java 11 s

Re: [DISCUSSION] Java 11 for Ignite 3.0 development

2020-12-08 Thread Alexei Scherbakov
I think we should move forward, so java11 seems like a proper choice for 3. ср, 9 дек. 2020 г. в 10:17, Ivan Bessonov : > This is an awesome idea. > > Honestly, I can't come up with strong technical arguments for Java 11 as a > source level, I had no chance to work with it long enough, but it fee

Re: [DISCUSSION] Java 11 for Ignite 3.0 development

2020-12-08 Thread Ivan Bessonov
This is an awesome idea. Honestly, I can't come up with strong technical arguments for Java 11 as a source level, I had no chance to work with it long enough, but it feels like a proper time to move to a "modern" technology. Subjectively I can say that Java 11 has a lot of good optimization and Ig

Re: [DISCUSSION] Java 11 for Ignite 3.0 development

2020-12-08 Thread Данилов Семён
+1 for sure. AFAIK, the only thing holding us back from using Java 11 is the dominance of Java 8, but I'm sure that by the time Ignite 3 is GA, there will be much fewer Java 8 users if any significant number at all. By the by, Ignite's sources need minimal effort to be able to be compiled with J

Re: [DISCUSSION] Java 11 for Ignite 3.0 development

2020-12-08 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
+1 for using java 11. > 8 дек. 2020 г., в 13:18, ткаленко кирилл написал(а): > > +1 > > 08.12.2020, 12:48, "Philipp Masharov" : >> Hello! >> >> Andrey's arguments are solid. >> >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:23 PM Pavel Tupitsyn wrote: >> >>> +1, Java 11 seems to be the only right choice at

Re: [DISCUSSION] Java 11 for Ignite 3.0 development

2020-12-08 Thread ткаленко кирилл
+1 08.12.2020, 12:48, "Philipp Masharov" : > Hello! > > Andrey's arguments are solid. > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:23 PM Pavel Tupitsyn wrote: > >>  +1, Java 11 seems to be the only right choice at the moment. >> >>  On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:08 PM Alexey Zinoviev >>  wrote: >> >>  > I totally

Re: [DISCUSSION] Java 11 for Ignite 3.0 development

2020-12-08 Thread Philipp Masharov
Hello! Andrey's arguments are solid. On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:23 PM Pavel Tupitsyn wrote: > +1, Java 11 seems to be the only right choice at the moment. > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:08 PM Alexey Zinoviev > wrote: > > > I totally support Java 11 for development. It's time to go forward > > >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Java 11 for Ignite 3.0 development

2020-12-08 Thread Pavel Tupitsyn
+1, Java 11 seems to be the only right choice at the moment. On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:08 PM Alexey Zinoviev wrote: > I totally support Java 11 for development. It's time to go forward > > вт, 8 дек. 2020 г. в 11:40, Andrey Gura : > > > Igniters, > > > > We already had some discussion about usin

Re: [DISCUSSION] Java 11 for Ignite 3.0 development

2020-12-08 Thread Alexey Zinoviev
I totally support Java 11 for development. It's time to go forward вт, 8 дек. 2020 г. в 11:40, Andrey Gura : > Igniters, > > We already had some discussion about using modern Java versions for > Ignite 3.0 development [1] but we still don't have consensus. > As I see from this discussion the stro