RE: Possible bug in PutAll() in Ignite 2.4, .Net client

2018-05-10 Thread Raymond Wilson
wil...@trimble.com] *Sent:* Friday, May 11, 2018 2:37 PM *To:* 'dev@ignite.apache.org' *Subject:* RE: Possible bug in PutAll() in Ignite 2.4, .Net client I have previously used the same logic using a long instead of a Guid without this issue. *From:* Raymond Wilson [mailto:raymond_wil...@trimbl

RE: Possible bug in PutAll() in Ignite 2.4, .Net client

2018-05-10 Thread Raymond Wilson
I have previously used the same logic using a long instead of a Guid without this issue. *From:* Raymond Wilson [mailto:raymond_wil...@trimble.com] *Sent:* Friday, May 11, 2018 2:36 PM *To:* 'dev@ignite.apache.org' *Subject:* RE: Possible bug in PutAll() in Ignite 2.4, .Net client

RE: Possible bug in PutAll() in Ignite 2.4, .Net client

2018-05-10 Thread Raymond Wilson
I have tried replacing the PutAll() with two Put()s, like this: cache.Put(key1, new byte[100]); cache.Put(key2, new byte[100]); The first Put throws this exception: *Name* *Value* *Type* ▶ $exception {Apache.Ignite.Core.Cache.CacheException: class org.apache.i