Got you, thanks. Let's leave it this way then if it's a standard naming
approach.
--
Denis
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 4:45 AM, Vladimir Ozerov
wrote:
> Logging/no logging is common naming for journal management commands. No
> reason to change it.
>
> пт, 23 февр. 2018 г. в 6:06, Dmitriy Setrakyan
Logging/no logging is common naming for journal management commands. No
reason to change it.
пт, 23 февр. 2018 г. в 6:06, Dmitriy Setrakyan :
> Denis, I am not sure I like the underscore. I believe Vladimir took the
> command name from other RDBMS systems, but I will let him comment.
>
> D.
>
> O
Denis, I am not sure I like the underscore. I believe Vladimir took the
command name from other RDBMS systems, but I will let him comment.
D.
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:27 PM, Denis Magda wrote:
> Vladimir, Anton,
>
> I've been reviewing the docs of WAL on/off capabilities [1] added to 2.4
> and
Vladimir, Anton,
I've been reviewing the docs of WAL on/off capabilities [1] added to 2.4
and personally think that LOGGING/NOLOGGING is not the best name to turn
WAL on/off with ALTER TABLE [2].
May I suggest to name it in a more human-friendly fashion such as:
ALTER TABLE table *[WAL_ON|WAL_OFF
