Yakov,
Here is the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6847
Feel free to add if I missed anything.
-Val
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 3:22 AM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
> Val, I really like your idea to implement common mechanism for all APIs.
> Can you please file a ticket?
>
> --Yakov
Val, I really like your idea to implement common mechanism for all APIs.
Can you please file a ticket?
--Yakov
Yakov,
Ideally - all of them :) Or at least those APIs that execute remote
operations (all cache operations, compute, service proxy invocations, ...).
Having an ability to add custom metadata to this kind of operations can be
very valuable for auditing purposes.
-Val
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:38
>>That's a very useful suggestion. Can it be supported for other APIs as
>> well, not only transactions?
>> -Val
Val, please clarify. What APIs do you mean?
--Yakov
Hi Igniters,
Would it be useful to provide some traceability identifier for messages
participating in the partition map exchange? This can be used to filter all
logs associated with the exchange. Or now there is some possibility?
Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov
чт, 5 окт. 2017 г. в 2:01, Valentin Kuli
That's a very useful suggestion. Can it be supported for other APIs as
well, not only transactions?
-Val
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Vladimir Ozerov
wrote:
> +1 for withTag()
>
> ср, 4 окт. 2017 г. в 17:19, Yakov Zhdanov :
>
> > Really like .withTag() suggestion!
> >
> > --Yakov
> >
>
+1 for withTag()
ср, 4 окт. 2017 г. в 17:19, Yakov Zhdanov :
> Really like .withTag() suggestion!
>
> --Yakov
>
Really like .withTag() suggestion!
--Yakov
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Konstantin Dudkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> .withTag maybe?
>
Agree, withTag() looks much better.
No I meant just a string
p.s. .withTag looks better
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Vladimir Ozerov
wrote:
> Sergey,
>
> Do you mean attaching something more than a single String?
>
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Konstantin Dudkov wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > .withTag maybe?
> >
> > 04/10/2017
Sergey,
Do you mean attaching something more than a single String?
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Konstantin Dudkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> .withTag maybe?
>
> 04/10/2017 14:52, Sergey Kozlov пишет:
>
> Hi
>>
>> .withApplication and .withMetatData may narrow use case. Looks like .
>> withDescription
Hi,
.withTag maybe?
04/10/2017 14:52, Sergey Kozlov пишет:
Hi
.withApplication and .withMetatData may narrow use case. Looks like .
withDescription can have more sense and allow use write any information
valuable for further debugging.
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
wrote:
Hi
.withApplication and .withMetatData may narrow use case. Looks like .
withDescription can have more sense and allow use write any information
valuable for further debugging.
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
wrote:
> I would rename to "withMetadata()".
>
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017
I would rename to "withMetadata()".
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Vladimir Ozerov
wrote:
> Alex,
>
> I do not think we have such feature in the product at the moment. But this
> could be very valuable addition. For example, we have somewhat similar task
> for JDBC - to track applications that
Alex,
I do not think we have such feature in the product at the moment. But this
could be very valuable addition. For example, we have somewhat similar task
for JDBC - to track applications that use the driver [1]. We can think of
adding a single optional string to transaction protocol, so that we
Alexey, thanks a lot!
This requires a change in application code.
Is there a way to do it without that?
Alexey
2017-10-04 13:22 GMT+03:00 Alexei Scherbakov :
> Alexey,
>
> Simplest way: wrap IgniteTransactions instance returned by
> ignite.transactions() with delegate using advanced logging capa
Alexey,
Simplest way: wrap IgniteTransactions instance returned by
ignite.transactions() with delegate using advanced logging capabilities for
tx* methods, like current thread and stack trace.
There is no notion of transaction parameters.
2017-10-04 12:40 GMT+03:00 Alexey Inozemtsev :
> Igniter
Igniters,
A team I'm working with uses Apache Ignite massively.
There are many application modules using the cluster.
We've faced a problem on how to identify the external app
modules which keep transactions open in the grid.
Right now we have to restart client nodes to get reed of them.
Is there
18 matches
Mail list logo
