Hi Nick,
I can't find any timeouts specified for transaction creation in IGNITE-6967
code (for services cache), so I'm not sure current fix wil help. But anyway
soon it can be double-checked with 2.5 release.
I hope IGNITE-6967 will be fixed soon in the IEP-17. Vyacheslav Daradur
picked up this t
Hi,
Would IGNITE-6827 potentially be a workaround for IGNITE-6967? I understand
that eventually IGNITE-6967 will not be applicable once the service grid
stops using the utility cache and switches to discovery messages, but I've
encountered odd deadlocks with PME and I'm growing more suspicious tha
Hi all, I've implemented corresponded .NET api.
Pavel, could you review my PR, please?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8075
2018-04-10 21:06 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Pavlov :
> Hi Pavel,
>
> thank you for bring up test questions. It seems my previous comments were
> not taken into account
Hi Pavel,
thank you for bring up test questions. It seems my previous comments were
not taken into account.
Igniters,
let me remind we should get passing TC suites before merge,
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-ReviewProcessandMaintainers
(hi
> Pavel Tupitsyn, what about .NET stuff ?
1) Thank you for filing the ticket, personally I have no plans to work on
it in the near future.
2) .NET tests fail, please make sure they are fixed before merging:
https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=1175956
TransactionsParityTest should b
Guys,
I've slightly modified public API javadoc as Denis Magda has suggested in
PR review.
Please take a look.
Pavel Tupitsyn, what about .NET stuff ?
I provided all necessary information in ticket [2]
Upsource link [1]
[1] https://reviews.ignite.apache.org/ignite/branch/PR%203624
[2] https:
I am not aware of any additional timeouts that we are willing to add in the
nearest future.
2018-04-09 16:01 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan :
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 5:42 AM, Alexey Goncharuk <
> alexey.goncha...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Guys,
> >
> > After the review in Upsource the configuratio
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 5:42 AM, Alexey Goncharuk wrote:
> Guys,
>
> After the review in Upsource the configuration parameter was renamed
> to txTimeoutOnPartMapSync, and it makes sense to me because PME is an
> implementation detail and it may change in future, partition map sync is a
> more abst
Guys,
After the review in Upsource the configuration parameter was renamed
to txTimeoutOnPartMapSync, and it makes sense to me because PME is an
implementation detail and it may change in future, partition map sync is a
more abstract term. For the same reason I like this parameter being placed
on
Alexey,
could you please create code review in Upsource? The PR is huge and it
would be great to have an ability to discuss changes in more
convenient way.
Thanks.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 12:42 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
wrote:
> I looked into the ticket and do not understand this property
> name: Ro
I looked into the ticket and do not understand this property
name: RollbackOnTopologyChangeTimeout
I think what we need to configure is a forceful kill of transactions in
case of partition map exchange, right? In that case, the timeout should be
configured for PME, not transactions. The property n
Guys,
I've looked at IGNITE-6827 implementation and have comment. I think
that rollbackOnTopologyChangeTimeout parameter isn't related with
implemented functionality. It's responsibility of PME to rollback
transactions that blocks exchange, so rollbackOnTopologyChangeTimeout
should be configured f
Hi Igniters,
A number of .NET tests failed, it seems it requied to be updated/fixed first
Ignite Platform .NET Core Linux [ tests 2 ]
dll: TransactionsParityTest.TestTransactions (master fail rate 0,0%)
dll: CachePartitionedTest.TestTransactionScopeMultiCache(True)
(master fail rate
Guys, especially Vladimir Ozerov, Yakov Zhanov, Dmitriy Setrakyan,
While the technical side of the change is being reviewed, I would also ask
you to pay attention to the public API changes here.
--AG
2018-03-21 23:43 GMT+03:00 Pavel Tupitsyn :
> Hi Alexei,
>
> > Pavel Tupitsyn, could you lend
Hi Alexei,
> Pavel Tupitsyn, could you lend a hand to help completing .NET part (two
new
public API methods are added as a part of working on [3], java code in
branch [2])
Please file a separate ticket for .NET changes.
I would like to help, but maybe some time later. No need to delay your
chang
Hi Alexei ,
Thank you for contribution, unfortunately there is too much tests failed
there:
.NET is broken
Ignite Platform .NET Long Running [ tests 3 ]
CachePartitionedNearEnabledTest.TestTransactionScopeMultiCache(True)
CachePartitionedTest.TestTransactionScopeMultiCache(True)
Cac
Igniters,
I prepared rather important patch [1] related to grid stability and need a
review and some help to finish it.
Semyon Boikov, could you please take a look on patch code ? [2]
Pavel Tupitsyn, could you lend a hand to help completing .NET part (two new
public API methods are added as a pa
17 matches
Mail list logo
