[GitHub] ignite pull request #3008: IGNITE-3244: fix for custom arrays properly seria...

2017-11-22 Thread zstan
Github user zstan closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3008 ---

[GitHub] ignite pull request #3008: IGNITE-3244: fix for custom arrays properly seria...

2017-11-09 Thread zstan
GitHub user zstan opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3008 IGNITE-3244: fix for custom arrays properly serialization You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-3244

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1505: IGNITE-3244 Custom arrays arent serialized proper...

2017-02-14 Thread voipp
Github user voipp closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1505 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab

Re: IGNITE-3244

2017-02-09 Thread ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV
;>>> > > >>>> There is javax.cache.integration.CacheWriter#write() method which > > >> writes > > >>>> key and value, wrapped in CacheEntryImpl. > > >>>> In case of class arrays, values must be in form of BinaryObject or > > >>&

Re: IGNITE-3244

2017-02-08 Thread Valentin Kulichenko
gt;>>> Yes, this is exactly the reason why this ticket is created. > Presently, > >>>>> binary marshaller ignores custom type for arrays. We need to find a > >> way > >>> how > >>>>> to handle this. > >>>>> > &g

Re: IGNITE-3244

2017-02-08 Thread Denis Magda
rrays. We need to find a >> way >>> how >>>>> to handle this. >>>>> >>>>> — >>>>> Denis >>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 2, 2017, at 6:23 AM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV < >>> alkuznetsov...@gmail.com> >>

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1505: IGNITE-3244 Custom arrays arent serialized proper...

2017-02-08 Thread voipp
GitHub user voipp opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1505 IGNITE-3244 Custom arrays arent serialized properly arrays type now considered while deserialization. After deserialization you've got array of correct type You can merge this pull request i

Re: IGNITE-3244

2017-02-07 Thread ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV
t; > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> I founded that cache.get(i) actually returns an array, containing > > >>> TestObject. But somehow the type of returned value is Object[] not > > >>> TestObject[] > > >>> > > >>> ср, 1 ф

Re: IGNITE-3244

2017-02-06 Thread ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV
not > > >>> TestObject[] > > >>> > > >>> ср, 1 февр. 2017 г. в 22:26, Denis Magda : > > >>> > > >>>> Excellent, please share the way you want to fix the issue with the > > >>>> comm

Re: IGNITE-3244

2017-02-06 Thread ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV
returned value is Object[] not > > >>> TestObject[] > > >>> > > >>> ср, 1 февр. 2017 г. в 22:26, Denis Magda : > > >>> > > >>>> Excellent, please share the way you want to fix the issue with the > > >>>> c

Re: IGNITE-3244

2017-02-06 Thread Vladimir Ozerov
nis Magda : > >>> > >>>> Excellent, please share the way you want to fix the issue with the > >>>> community. You might get a valuable feedback before getting down to > >> coding. > >>>> > >>>> — > >>>&

Re: IGNITE-3244

2017-02-03 Thread Denis Magda
getting down to >> coding. >>>> >>>> — >>>> Denis >>>> >>>>> On Feb 1, 2017, at 1:18 AM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV < >> alkuznetsov...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> will take https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3244 >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> *Best Regards,* >>>>> >>>>> *Kuznetsov Aleksey* >>>> >>>> -- >>> >>> *Best Regards,* >>> >>> *Kuznetsov Aleksey* >> >> -- > > *Best Regards,* > > *Kuznetsov Aleksey*

Re: IGNITE-3244

2017-02-03 Thread ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV
You might get a valuable feedback before getting down to > coding. > >> > >> — > >> Denis > >> > >>> On Feb 1, 2017, at 1:18 AM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV < > alkuznetsov...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> will take

Re: IGNITE-3244

2017-02-03 Thread Vladimir Ozerov
6, Denis Magda : > > > > > >> Excellent, please share the way you want to fix the issue with the > > >> community. You might get a valuable feedback before getting down to > > coding. > > >> > > >> — > >

Re: IGNITE-3244

2017-02-03 Thread ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV
gt; >> > >>> On Feb 1, 2017, at 1:18 AM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV < > alkuznetsov...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> will take https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3244 > >>> -- > >>> > >>> *Best Regards,* > >>> > >>> *Kuznetsov Aleksey* > >> > >> -- > > > > *Best Regards,* > > > > *Kuznetsov Aleksey* > > -- *Best Regards,* *Kuznetsov Aleksey*

Re: IGNITE-3244

2017-02-02 Thread Denis Magda
feedback before getting down to coding. >> >> — >> Denis >> >>> On Feb 1, 2017, at 1:18 AM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV >> wrote: >>> >>> will take https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3244 >>> -- >>> >>> *Best Regards,* >>> >>> *Kuznetsov Aleksey* >> >> -- > > *Best Regards,* > > *Kuznetsov Aleksey*

Re: IGNITE-3244

2017-02-02 Thread ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV
luable feedback before getting down to coding. > > — > Denis > > > On Feb 1, 2017, at 1:18 AM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV > wrote: > > > > will take https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3244 > > -- > > > > *Best Regards,* > > > > *Kuznetsov Aleksey* > > -- *Best Regards,* *Kuznetsov Aleksey*

Re: IGNITE-3244

2017-02-01 Thread Denis Magda
Excellent, please share the way you want to fix the issue with the community. You might get a valuable feedback before getting down to coding. — Denis > On Feb 1, 2017, at 1:18 AM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV > wrote: > > will take https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3244 >

IGNITE-3244

2017-02-01 Thread ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV
will take https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3244 -- *Best Regards,* *Kuznetsov Aleksey*

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-3244) Custom arrays are not serialized/deserialized properly by CacheObjectBinaryProcessorImpl

2016-06-03 Thread Denis Magda (JIRA)
Denis Magda created IGNITE-3244: --- Summary: Custom arrays are not serialized/deserialized properly by CacheObjectBinaryProcessorImpl Key: IGNITE-3244 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3244