Nikolay,
Could you please check?
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 1:50 PM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV wrote:
> HOLE was introduced in CacheContinuousQueryHandler.PartitionRecovery.
> Ticket *IGNITE-426 Implemented failover for Continuous query.*
> Then it was refactored in *Continuous queries fixes.*
> After ref
HOLE was introduced in CacheContinuousQueryHandler.PartitionRecovery.
Ticket *IGNITE-426 Implemented failover for Continuous query.*
Then it was refactored in *Continuous queries fixes.*
After refactoring the variable is never compares to true. Probably, its a
bug.
сб, 16 сент. 2017 г. в 1:52, Den
I like the name. "Black holes" pop up first in my head :) The hole can absorb
events and confine and digest them for billions of year. Sorry for off topic.
—
Denis
> On Sep 15, 2017, at 10:14 AM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV
> wrote:
>
> Hi, Ignters!
>
>
> We have a strange field HOLE in CacheContinu
Hi, Ignters!
We have a strange field HOLE in CacheContinuousQueryPartitionRecovery
which compared to pending events in
CacheContinuousQueryPartitionRecovery#collectEntries. And it is never
equals any entry.
Do we need it ? Or it can be removed.
--
*Best Regards,*
*Kuznetsov Aleksey*
