Created JIRA ticket for this issue -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7902
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Valentin Kulichenko <
valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I stumbled across couple of use cases where swap space was more suitable
> than persistence. However, enabling both
I stumbled across couple of use cases where swap space was more suitable
than persistence. However, enabling both for a same region definitely
doesn't make sense to me, I would throw an exception in this case.
-Val
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Denis Magda wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
>
> > Swap is le
Hi Ivan,
> Swap is legacy lightweight version of Ignite Native Persistence. In swap
> mode, we fully rely on OS in storing offheap memory into memory-mapped
> file. We don't provide durability guarantees in this mode. From my point of
> view, after 2.1 release there's no reason to prefer swap mod
Prachi,
Swap is legacy lightweight version of Ignite Native Persistence. In swap
mode, we fully rely on OS in storing offheap memory into memory-mapped
file. We don't provide durability guarantees in this mode. From my point
of view, after 2.1 release there's no reason to prefer swap mode over
Engineers,
How does persistence and swap work when both are enabled? I was under the
impression that for a data region you can either have swap or persistence
configured at a time, but not both. Please clarify.
Thanks,
-Prachi
