Fine for me. Vladimir, can you please change it in master?
--Yakov
2016-03-31 19:52 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan :
> The message looks a little incomplete to me. How about:
>
> “Failed to find an atomic structure with given name (increase
> AtomicConfiguration.backups if it was lost due to a fail
The message looks a little incomplete to me. How about:
“Failed to find an atomic structure with given name (increase
AtomicConfiguration.backups if it was lost due to a failed or left node):
*MyStructureName*”
D.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
> How about this one - Fai
How about this one - Failed to find atomic with given name (increase
AtomicConfiguration.backups
count if it has been lost due to node leave)
?
--Yakov
2016-03-31 9:50 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov :
> Igniters,
>
> I noted that in our AtomicConfiguration we have PARTITIONED cache with
> backups=0.
Igniters,
I noted that in our AtomicConfiguration we have PARTITIONED cache with
backups=0. This appears to be very unreliable configuration which do not
survive node crashes.
For example, if user create AtomicLong with this config and the kill a
node, he could receive error message "Failed to fin
