Re: [DISCUSSION] IEP-91 Transaction protocol

Hai team , can u please remove my mailid from your mailing chain On Mon, 26 Sep, 2022, 6:02 pm Alexei Scherbakov, < alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, igniters. > > After a long and hard work I've finally pushed the IEP > < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-91%3A

Re: [DISCUSSION] IEP-91 Transaction protocol

Hi Roman, good catch. These methods should be in Transaction, I've fixed that. вт, 11 окт. 2022 г. в 13:12, Roman Puchkovskiy : > Hi Alexei. > > Great proposal, thank you for your efforts. > > One thing that I noted is that the proposed IgniteInstructions > interface contains parameterless commi

Re: [DISCUSSION] IEP-91 Transaction protocol

Hi Alexei. Great proposal, thank you for your efforts. One thing that I noted is that the proposed IgniteInstructions interface contains parameterless commit*() and rollback*() methods. The transactions are not thread-bound, so there seems to be no implicit mechanism for the global IgniteInstruct

[DISCUSSION] IEP-91 Transaction protocol

Hello, igniters. After a long and hard work I've finally pushed the IEP to the necessary detail level. Any useful feedback would be greatly appreciated. -- Best regards, Alexei Scherbakov