Hello Igniters.
I see that the main argument against Micronaut is that we need
Micronaut+Swagger to achieve IEP 87 if we can use only Swagger. I agree
this is a valid point and logically. But I think we can take a look into it
from another side, from future vision. Main idea to start using microna
Hi,
Are we going to include swagger into production packages? I always
thought (I might be mistaken) that swagger should be used during
development. Worries are usual:
1. Potential vulnerabilities.
2. Unintentional use of transitive dependencies.
Best regards,
Ivan Pavlukhin
чт, 26 мая 2022 г. в
+1 from me, de facto swagger standard within OpenApi.
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 7:57 PM Aleksandr Pakhomov wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> Discussion about 3rd party dependencies took place
> and I think it is time to vote if we agreed to include
> swagger dependency to the Ignite 3 or not.
>
> The e
+1 from me, I've seen many projects using this approach and I personally
find it quite useful
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 5:54 PM Andrey Gura wrote:
> Ilya,
>
> are there any alternatives to Swagger that you could recommend that
> don't have the mentioned drawback?
>
> It seems that OPen API itself
Why couldn't the handlers be annotated?
I think Kirill Gusakov (as the feature contributor) can give some
ideas about what and how should be annotated. This may require some
tweaking.
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 6:06 PM Aleksandr Pakhomov wrote:
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> Yes, swagger allows to annotate
Hi Alexander,
Yes, swagger allows to annotate classes
and then the spec will be generated. But
here is a question. What classes should we
annotade?
Web framework brings the convention about
how to write an endpoint and what to annotate.
Our own REST server implementation does not.
It is ju
Agree with Alexander. I ask the same question in the vote thread.
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 5:47 PM Alexander Polovtcev
wrote:
>
> Aleksandr,
>
> Can we use these annotations without the micronaut dependencies? If yes,
> why do we need micronaut at all?
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 5:34 PM Aleksandr
Ilya,
are there any alternatives to Swagger that you could recommend that
don't have the mentioned drawback?
It seems that OPen API itself doesn't define primitive and wrapped
types because such information is language/runtime/etc specific. Maybe
this problem will be addressed in the future.
On
Aleksandr,
Can we use these annotations without the micronaut dependencies? If yes,
why do we need micronaut at all?
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 5:34 PM Aleksandr Pakhomov wrote:
> Yes, swagger-core has its own set of annotations [1]
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-core/wiki/Swagge
-1 (binding) from me.
Because (if I understood correctly) the main value of the IEP-87 is
the possibility to generate API specification and Swagger annotations
is enough for this purpose I don't see reasons for these dependencies.
We already have our own controllers for REST-like API's
implementat
> The main
functionality of micronaut framework is REST, so this
library is scanned for vulnerabilities regularly and fixes
them asap (looking to [1] it takes about a week).
I don't think that Ignite REST server implementation
will be scanned as regular as micronaut and issues
will be fixed as qui
Aleksandr,
Both proposed options look good to me because both cases assume that a
user must express their intent explicitly.
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 10:53 AM Aleksandr Pakhomov wrote:
>
> I got it. What do you think about this proposal:
>
> - “ignite” prints help
> - “ignite shell” enters REP
Andrey,
there is no IEP for Java API for SQL and would be great to have it.
I'll create the IEP soon.
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 1:56 PM Andrey Mashenkov
wrote:
>
> JFYI. we have merged the initial version of SQL public API [1] and are
> going to implement it in epic [2] and I've created few ticket
13 matches
Mail list logo
