Denis,
I suppose we are using not optimal strategy here. And motivation is simple:
1. Code review is "expensive", benchmarking (usually) are "cheap".
2. Code review is "subjective", benchmarking are "objective".
And my personal opinion here is that there could be a performance win
with Optane in
Emmanouil, Saikat,
After contemplating on this, let me propose another way with this
particular integration that is aligned with our modularization endeavor.
The modularization [1] defines the Ignite core, Ignite modules, and
independent integrations. The first two are to be located in Ignite
repo
Alex, thanks for an extensive summary and proposing different
implementation trails. Presently, the JEP-352 approach seems the most
reasonable - JDK folks will take care of the integration and will be
testing/maintaining the feature going forward, while the Ignite community
will reuse what JDK prov
Yes, it may be that something is wrong. I don't remember exactly.
But if this was another image, it was definitely lost (it was just png, no
sources available).
вт, 15 окт. 2019 г. в 18:29, Ivan Pavlukhin :
> Dmitriy,
>
> Thank you!
>
> Funny thing, I added exactly the same picture first. But l
Hi Igniters,
I've detected some new issue on TeamCity to be handled. You are more than
welcomed to help.
*New Critical Failure in master Platform .NET (Inspections)*
https://ci.ignite.apache.org/buildConfiguration/IgniteTests24Java8_PlatformNetInspections?branch=%3Cdefault%3E
No changes
Alexandr Shapkin created IGNITE-12293:
-
Summary: .NET thin client: config serialization should use OpCodes
Key: IGNITE-12293
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12293
Project: Ignite
Aleksey Plekhanov created IGNITE-12292:
--
Summary: Java thin client: In some cases txId intersection (tx
started on different nodes) leads to errors
Key: IGNITE-12292
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
Dmitriy,
Thank you!
Funny thing, I added exactly the same picture first. But later
realized that there is an almost same picture in section "BPlus Tree
Structure" on the same page [1]. So, I decided that there is something
wrong =)
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Ignite+D
Yuriy Shuliha created IGNITE-12291:
---
Summary: Create controllable paged query requests / responses for
TextQuery similar to current SQL result processing
Key: IGNITE-12291
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/br
Hi Ivan,
thank you for doing all these changes. I've attached the last one.
Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov
вт, 15 окт. 2019 г. в 15:56, Ivan Pavlukhin :
> Dmitriy,
>
> I edited pages [1, 2] by myself. Unfortunately failed to find a
> suitable image for [1] in section "Pages & links" (left a note).
>
Dmitriy,
I edited pages [1, 2] by myself. Unfortunately failed to find a
suitable image for [1] in section "Pages & links" (left a note).
Please check when you have time.
Just for a protocol, original images are at [3].
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Ignite+Durable+Memor
I've shared in ASF slack, Ignite channel.
I didn't manage to do it on the weekend, but this change is on my list.
пн, 14 окт. 2019 г. в 18:23, Ivan Pavlukhin :
> Dmitriy,
>
> > PS, I've shared links to new images sources in the Slack channel.
>
> Cannot find links. Which Slack channel was meant?
Hi, Alexei!
Thank you for reply!
> The states ACTIVE, INACTIVE, READ-ONLY look confusing. Actually read-only
cluster is active too.
How about INACTIVE, ACTIVE, ACTIVE_READ-ONLY states?
> Also it would be useful to allow users wait for re-balance which could
happen after activation in read-only m
Hi, Igniters!
I'd like to add a new wiki page with IEP for the Sandbox feature.
Could someone grant me (Denis Garus) write permission?
14 matches
Mail list logo
