Hello, Denis.
Spark uses Scala 2.11 [1]
Scala 2.11 compatible with the jdk version described on [2].
Few notes from the link:
> We recommend using Java 8 for compiling Scala code
> JDK 11 compatibility notes
> As of Scala 2.13.0, 2.12.8 and 2.11.12, JDK 11 support is incomplete
I also got sever
YuJue Li created IGNITE-12202:
-
Summary: Support system function ROWNUM()
Key: IGNITE-12202
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12202
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: New Feature
Hi Alexey,
dist SVN repo usually contains only latest version, older versions go to
the archive.
Release 2.7.5 can be moved to the archive (with corresponding site update).
And a folder for 2.7.0 is empty, it definitely can be deleted.
Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov
чт, 19 сент. 2019 г. в 21:24, Deni
Nikolay,
What needs to be done to ensure Java 9++ works with Spark Examples? Do we
need to create another Spark module or drop some scala version?
-
Denis
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 9:23 AM Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
> Hello, Igniters.
>
> Examples suite on TC doesn't work correctly under java9+. [1
Dmitry,
Everyone who is added to the readme.io gets admin rights. The owner is one
of our PMC Members Dmitry Setrakyan. We can start a discussion and transfer
the ownership rights to some generic account known by PMC group only.
-
Denis
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 3:40 AM Dmitriy Pavlov wrote:
>
Folks,
I am following the step 6.3.12 of the release process [1] and see that the
release 2.7.0 is still present in the dist folder. Do I understand
correctly that I can remove both 2.7.0 and 2.7.5 at this point and 2.7.0
should have been removed during 2.7.5 release?
If not, the doc should be up
Please post the link to this thread when you'll create the topic to close
this discussion
>From my side, unfortunately, I'm not ready to be a driver of the 2.8
release, but could as one of the Santa's helpers.
чт, 19 сент. 2019 г. в 20:12, Maxim Muzafarov :
> Folks,
>
> I'll create an appropriate
I support this solution, I think there is no issue to run with java 8 next
1-2 years all examples for TC purposes
чт, 19 сент. 2019 г. в 19:23, Nikolay Izhikov :
> Hello, Igniters.
>
> Examples suite on TC doesn't work correctly under java9+. [1], [2]
>
> The reason is the Spark examples.
>
> Spa
Folks,
I'll create an appropriate topic.
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 20:00, Denis Magda wrote:
>
> Ok, let's start an official discussion about 2.8 release and select the one
> who will be driving/managing it.
>
> -
> Denis
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 9:01 AM Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
>
> > Scope:
>
Ok, let's start an official discussion about 2.8 release and select the one
who will be driving/managing it.
-
Denis
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 9:01 AM Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
> Scope:
>
> * master fixes
> * ML improvements
> * IEP-35: Metric + System views.
> * New implementation of Service Grid
Hello, Igniters.
Examples suite on TC doesn't work correctly under java9+. [1], [2]
The reason is the Spark examples.
Spark 2.3(our current version) work with scala 2.11 and scala 2.11 support of
java9+ is "incomplete".
Can we stick example suite to jdk8 only?
[1]
https://ci.ignite.apache.or
Scope:
* master fixes
* ML improvements
* IEP-35: Metric + System views.
* New implementation of Service Grid
В Чт, 19/09/2019 в 18:56 +0300, Maxim Muzafarov пишет:
> Alexey, Denis,
>
> I've always thought that we are living in a paradigm that `the master
> branch is the release ready branch`.
Alexey, Denis,
I've always thought that we are living in a paradigm that `the master
branch is the release ready branch`. Don't we? If so, then we should
take additional attention to commits we make, because it's true that
we have some `blocker` release issues in the master branch. I also
think al
No objection from my side if somebody could say that master is ready or
will be ready to release in a few months
чт, 19 сент. 2019 г. в 14:21, Nikolay Izhikov :
> +1 for 2.8 from me
>
> Scope:
>
> * master fixes
> * ML improvements
> * IEP-35: Metric + System views.
>
>
>
> В Чт, 19/09/2019 в 14:
shivakumar created IGNITE-12201:
---
Summary: distributed sql join not working as mentioned in
documentation
Key: IGNITE-12201
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12201
Project: Ignite
Dmitriy Sorokin created IGNITE-12200:
Summary: More informative assertion message at constructor of
CachedDeploymentInfo (GridCacheDeploymentManager class)
Key: IGNITE-12200
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira
Good news, everyone, I've found a straightforward fix for this,
cross-platform and in pure C#.
Will be included in Ignite 2.8. Details in the ticket.
Thanks
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:20 PM Pavel Tupitsyn
wrote:
> Denis, the problem is described in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE
+1 for 2.8 from me
Scope:
* master fixes
* ML improvements
* IEP-35: Metric + System views.
В Чт, 19/09/2019 в 14:14 +0300, Pavel Tupitsyn пишет:
> +1 for 2.8
>
> We should not hold master anymore, it has been a year already.
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:42 PM Dmitriy Pavlov wrote:
>
> >
Ivan,
The useful profile can be produced only by the reproducible benchmark.
We're working on such benchmark to analyze duration and measure the
improvement.
Currently, only the typical overall duration from prod servers is known.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:09 PM Павлухин Иван wrote:
> Anton,
+1 for 2.8
We should not hold master anymore, it has been a year already.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:42 PM Dmitriy Pavlov wrote:
> I like both options 2.7.7 & 2.8 both have their benefits.
>
> But someday we will anyway need to release master state. Let's not freeze
> master for years as Zookeep
Andrey Gura created IGNITE-12199:
Summary: WAL record with data entries doesn't flushes on backups
for transactional cache
Key: IGNITE-12199
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12199
Pro
I like both options 2.7.7 & 2.8 both have their benefits.
But someday we will anyway need to release master state. Let's not freeze
master for years as Zookeeper did with 3.0.
So I like option with 2.8 release more.
Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov
чт, 19 сент. 2019 г. в 01:42, Denis Magda :
> Ignite
Artem, thank you for doing that. But the same issue came up during 2.7.5.
IMO PMC should have admin access to all these projects.
Who can grant these permissions?
Sincerely
Dmitriy Pavlov
чт, 19 сент. 2019 г. в 09:44, Artem Budnikov :
> Hi,
>
> I've created new versions for other projects on r
Hello, liyuj
> I want to know why
I suppose we are talking about Ignite SQL engine, not about Spark integration
module(as it written in the message topic)
The simple answer - because, it is not implemented.
You can file a ticket and we wil see what we can do.
You can contribute the support of
Alexey,
Let's combine your and Ivan's proposals.
>> vacuum command, which acquires exclusive table lock, so no concurrent
activities on the table are possible.
and
>> Could the problem be solved by stopping a node which needs to be
defragmented, clearing persistence files and restarting the node?
Anton, folks,
Out of curiosity. Do we have some measurements of PME execution in an
environment similar to some real-world one? In my mind some kind of
"profile" showing durations of different PME phases with an indication
where we are "blocked" would be ideal.
ср, 18 сент. 2019 г. в 13:27, Anton
Anton,
> >> The solution which Anton suggested does not look easy because it will
> most likely significantly hurt performance
> Mostly agree here, but what drop do we expect? What price do we ready to
> pay?
> Not sure, but seems some vendors ready to pay, for example, 5% drop for
> this.
5% m
Yuriy,
Greatly appreciate your interest.
Could you please elaborate a little bit about sorting? What tasks does
it help to solve and how? It would be great to provide an example.
ср, 18 сент. 2019 г. в 09:39, Alexei Scherbakov :
>
> Denis,
>
> I like the idea of throwing an exception for enabled
28 matches
Mail list logo
