Re: Adding Kubernetes IP finder to Web Console IP finders list

Created issue to add possibility to configure Kubernates IP finder. You can track it by link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4871 On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Denis Magda wrote: > Alex, > > Presently, if to go to the Clusters configuration in Web Console it won’t > be possible

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4871) Web console: Implement possibility to configure Kubernetes IP finder

Vasiliy Sisko created IGNITE-4871: - Summary: Web console: Implement possibility to configure Kubernetes IP finder Key: IGNITE-4871 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4871 Project: Ignit

Adding Kubernetes IP finder to Web Console IP finders list

Alex, Presently, if to go to the Clusters configuration in Web Console it won’t be possible to set Kubernetes IP finder as a desired one. Would you mind adding it to the list? https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/kubernetes-discovery

Re: Continuations for services

Vova, Agree, I already merged IGNITE-4802. However, I'm still interested why we always switch to another thread when executing a job locally. Does anyone have an idea why we do this? -Val On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Vladimir Ozerov wrote: > Valya, > > I don't think it will resolve all th

Re: IGNITE-2766 Spring Cache Manager ReConnect Issue

Rishi, You should be able to assign to tickets to yourself now. -Val On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Rishi Yagnik wrote: > Hi Val, > > My user name is ryagnik > > Thanks, > Rishi > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Valentin Kulichenko < > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Rishi

Re: IGNITE-2766 Spring Cache Manager ReConnect Issue

Hi Val, My user name is ryagnik Thanks, Rishi On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Valentin Kulichenko < valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rishi, > > What is your username in Jira? I will add you as a contributor. > > Also please go through [1] and [2] for all the details about our proces

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1679: IGNITE-4575: Added enum support to SQL queries

GitHub user skalashnikov opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1679 IGNITE-4575: Added enum support to SQL queries You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-4575 Alterna

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1678: Ignite 1925

GitHub user iveselovskiy opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1678 Ignite 1925 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-1925 Alternatively you can review and apply the

Re: IGNITE-2766 Spring Cache Manager ReConnect Issue

Hi Rishi, What is your username in Jira? I will add you as a contributor. Also please go through [1] and [2] for all the details about our process. [1] https://ignite.apache.org/community/contribute.html#contribute [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Development+Process -Val

Re: New blog post: LINQ vs SQL in Ignite.NET: Performance

Easy readable and as usually a comprehensive blog from Pavel! Recommend everyone to spend a couple of minutes for it. Pavel, do you think we can apply the same optimizations LING does for our “raw” SQL queries? Prachi, please post to DZone and find a time updating the blogs page. — Denis > On

Re: IGNITE - 4760 : working in hibernate module

Vadim, What IDE do you use? My recommendation would be to set up everything let’s say under IntellijIDEA or Eclipse and after that trying to compile from a terminal. This is how you can easily prepare the dev env in IntellijIDEA: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Project+Setup

Re: Apache Ignite 2.0 Release

I merged several important changes today: - IGNITE-3579: Message type should be short - IGNITE-4475: Simplify async API On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Valentin Kulichenko < valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rishi, > > Yes, the fix will be in 2.0. > > -Val > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7

Re: Make async API great again

Promising beginning of the week! So many talks in the past and finally we came to the logical end. Thanks to both of you Taras and Vovan to making this real ;) Could any of you update the Migration Guide simplifying the life for those who will be migrating from AI 1.x? https://cwiki.apache.org/

New blog post: LINQ vs SQL in Ignite.NET: Performance

Enjoy: https://ptupitsyn.github.io/LINQ-vs-SQL-in-Ignite/

Re: Ignite-4795 - ready for review

Hello Dmitriy, thanks! Someone will have a look at your changes soon. Sorry for the delay. — Denis > On Mar 27, 2017, at 3:24 AM, Дмитрий Рябов wrote: > > Hello, can anyone review this issue? > > 2017-03-20 16:33 GMT+03:00 Дмитрий Рябов : > >> Done. >> >> 2017-03-20 16:30 GMT+03:00 Антон Чу

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1677: ignite-4869 remove unnecessary benchmarks for leg...

GitHub user ezhuravl opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1677 ignite-4869 remove unnecessary benchmarks for legacy binary identity You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ig

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4870) .NET: QueryEntity.TableName

Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-4870: -- Summary: .NET: QueryEntity.TableName Key: IGNITE-4870 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4870 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4869) Unnecessary benchmarcs for legacy minary identity

Evgenii Zhuravlev created IGNITE-4869: - Summary: Unnecessary benchmarcs for legacy minary identity Key: IGNITE-4869 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4869 Project: Ignite

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4868) SQL: Entry can't be removed from index with 'Object.class' key type configured.

Andrew Mashenkov created IGNITE-4868: Summary: SQL: Entry can't be removed from index with 'Object.class' key type configured. Key: IGNITE-4868 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4868

Re: IGNITE - 4760 : working in hibernate module

Valentin, OK. To enabled it in my environment I done next: - built project with command - mvn clean package -DskipTests -Prelease,lgpl - added folder hibernate to modules in project structure - added library to dependencies (without it import doesn't working) After that I have a lot of error, for

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1676: IGNITE-4501: Improvement of connection in a clust...

GitHub user SharplEr opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1676 IGNITE-4501: Improvement of connection in a cluster of new node Reopen that PR: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1436 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $

Re: IgniteFuture adapters

True, I just prefer functional style over static methods. Regarding "why should this method be a part of the future API" - why not? It helps to chain such calls instead of call nesting. Of course, if Java had extension methods it wouldn't be needed, but we don't have them. On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 a

Re: IgniteFuture adapters

+1 to Alex, this is something external to IgniteFuture. Should Ignite was implemented in .NET, we could have add proposed feature it using extension methods. But (un)fortunately Ignite is Java-based :-) On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Alexey Goncharuk < alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Serg

Re: IgniteFuture adapters

Sergei, Why should this method be a part of the future API? The only implementation will do "return func(this);" I can achieve the same result the following way: rx(compute.runAsync(runnable)).timeout(5_000).subscribe(); 2017-03-27 15:54 GMT+03:00 Sergei Egorov : > Take a look at my initial c

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1670: IGNITE-4102 .NET: Generify ICacheStore

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1670 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena

Re: IgniteFuture adapters

Take a look at my initial code. public IgniteFuture chain(IgniteClosure, T> doneCb); vs public R to(IgniteClosure, R> transformer); The result of "chain" is IgniteFuture. The result of "to" is the object returned from transformer. It would be CompletableFuture, Rx's Observable, Reactor's Mo

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1654: IGNITE-4827 Remove deprecated code related to bac...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1654 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena

Re: IgniteFuture adapters

Em... When you get result of your future, closure will produce new future with completely different type. 2017-03-27 13:43 GMT+03:00 Sergei Egorov : > It doesn't :) > > It returns another IgniteFuture where I want to transform it to completely > different type. > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:41 PM

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1668: IGNITE-4351 .NET: Use BinaryArrayIdentityResolver...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1668 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1649: Ignite 4558 Use BinaryArrayIdentityResolver by de...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1649 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena

Re: IgniteFuture adapters

It doesn't :) It returns another IgniteFuture where I want to transform it to completely different type. On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:41 PM Дмитрий Рябов wrote: > IgniteFuture have method > > public IgniteFuture chain(IgniteClosure, T> > doneCb); > > which do this. > > 2017-03-27 13:30 GMT+03:00

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4867) CacheMetricsSnapshot ignores 'size' and 'keySize' fields

Dmitry Karachentsev created IGNITE-4867: --- Summary: CacheMetricsSnapshot ignores 'size' and 'keySize' fields Key: IGNITE-4867 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4867 Project: Ignite

Re: IgniteFuture adapters

IgniteFuture have method public IgniteFuture chain(IgniteClosure, T> doneCb); which do this. 2017-03-27 13:30 GMT+03:00 Sergei Egorov : > Hi! > > Would be nice if igniteFuture would provide a small but very usable method: > > public R to(Function, R> transformer) > > it will allow to chai

Re: Make async API great again

Cool! Please check my neighboring thread about special .to() method on IgniteFuture to make it even better :) On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:32 PM Vladimir Ozerov wrote: > Igniters, > > I am glad to announce that old async-style is finally deprecated and now > all asynchronous methods are defined ex

Re: Make async API great again

Igniters, I am glad to announce that old async-style is finally deprecated and now all asynchronous methods are defined explicitly! Woohoo! Thanks to Taras for this important contribution. On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Taras Ledkov wrote: > Each compute method produces task. For 'run', 'call

Re: Ignite-4795 - ready for review

Hello, can anyone review this issue? 2017-03-20 16:33 GMT+03:00 Дмитрий Рябов : > Done. > > 2017-03-20 16:30 GMT+03:00 Антон Чураев : > >> Dmitry, thank you! >> >> Could you please also change issue status to "Patch available". >> >> 2017-03-20 16:01 GMT+03:00 Дмитрий Рябов : >> >> > Hello, commu

IgniteFuture adapters

Hi! Would be nice if igniteFuture would provide a small but very usable method: public R to(Function, R> transformer) it will allow to chain it like: compute.runAsync(runnable).to(rx()).timeout(5_000).subscribe() Where rx() is just a static function with something like: public sta

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1648: IGNITE-4475 Simplify async API

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1648 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1501: IGNITE-3579 Change lenght of the message type fro...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1501 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1675: IGNITE-4865 Verbose logging, informative messages

GitHub user akuramshingg opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1675 IGNITE-4865 Verbose logging, informative messages You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-4865 Alte

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4866) Add lazy value deserialization in GridCacheRawVersionedEntry

Dmitry Karachentsev created IGNITE-4866: --- Summary: Add lazy value deserialization in GridCacheRawVersionedEntry Key: IGNITE-4866 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4866 Project: I

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1674: IGNITE-4534: Implement offheap eviction policies ...

GitHub user glukos opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1674 IGNITE-4534: Implement offheap eviction policies based on page memory Per-page eviction policies are implemented, algorithm (random-LRU or random-K-LRU) can be configured in MemoryPolicyConfiguratio

question about peeking entry from cache

Hi all! There is method that peek cache entry from a cache org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheAdapter#peekEx(java.lang.Object) And there is another method: org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheMapEntry#peek(boolean, boolean, boolean, org.apache.ignite.internal.pr

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4865) Non-informative error message on using GridClientOptimizedMarshaller with unknown task classes

Alexandr Kuramshin created IGNITE-4865: -- Summary: Non-informative error message on using GridClientOptimizedMarshaller with unknown task classes Key: IGNITE-4865 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGN

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1673: IGNITE-4838 Check task class on null when task na...

GitHub user vsisko opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1673 IGNITE-4838 Check task class on null when task name is invalid. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-48

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4864) .NET: Support arrays in SQL

Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-4864: -- Summary: .NET: Support arrays in SQL Key: IGNITE-4864 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4864 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Improvement