Dmitriy,
I think what Romain is referring to is other TCKs. Generally, geronimo JAR
versions don't reflect the version of spec that they implement. There may
be alpha releases that match EDRs, or alphas that are based on the final
version but with minor tweaks.
For reference, Apache ActiveMQ Ar
Romain, I am not sure what you mean by not having access to TCK. Are you
talking about validating compatibility with JCAche using the TCK [1]? In
this case, Apache Ignite does pass the TCK. Moreover, the TCK seems to be
licensed under Apache 2.0 [2]. Can you please explain?
[1] https://github.com/
Alpha cause asf doesnt have oracle tck so we cant validate binary compat
but it targets jcache 1.0. More a legal thing than anything else. If you
have access to tck and can validate the binaries we can move on 1.0
Le 27 mars 2016 00:21, "Dmitriy Setrakyan" a écrit :
> Hi Romain,
>
> The only issu
Yakov, I've seen your comments, can you please check the jira again?
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
> Vlad, can you please check my comments again?
>
> --Yakov
>
> 2016-03-18 17:57 GMT+03:00 Vladisav Jelisavcic :
>
> > Hi Yakov,
> >
> > yes, thanks for the comments, I thi
Dmitriy,
Honestly I was thinking only of window processing to cover only this specific
area. But I think looking at reactive streams makes sense and window processing
can be implemented within reactive streams with all three delivery guarantee
semantics (starting with the easiest two).
Also I am
