Re: [VOTE] Drop Java 8 support in Iceberg 1.7.0

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Huang-Hsiang > On Jul 27, 2024, at 12:42 AM, Steve Zhang > wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Steve Zhang > > > >> On Jul 26, 2024, at 9:15 AM, Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >

Re: [DISCUSS] Formalized File IO Properties

Hi everyone, I tried to consolidate S3 properties in this PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11321 Hopefully we can start building a single source of truth from it. Thanks for your review, -Hsiang > On Aug 7, 2024, at 3:44 AM, Kevin Liu wrote: > > +1 on standardizing, and possibly e

Re: [VOTE] Add Geometry and Geography types for V3

+1 (non-binding) Huang-Hsiang > On Feb 6, 2025, at 12:11 PM, Jia Yu wrote: > > +1 (non-binding)

Re: Welcome Huaxin Gao as a committer!

Congratulations Huaxin! Huang-Hsiang > On Feb 6, 2025, at 9:32 AM, Wing Yew Poon wrote: > > Congratulations Huaxin! Awesome! > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 9:27 AM Yufei Gu > wrote: >> Congrats Huaxin! >> >> Yufei >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 9:09 AM Steve Zh

Re: [VOTE] Minor simplifications for Geo Spec

+1 (non-binding) > On Mar 19, 2025, at 9:27 AM, Brian Hulette wrote: > > +1 > > I double-checked why a JSON object was allowed in the first place. It looks > like the original motivation was to support PROJJSON, but we switched to > using projjson: where points to a table property. > > On W

Re: [VOTE] Add encryption keys to table metadata

+1 (non-binding) Huang-Hsiang > On Apr 30, 2025, at 10:06 AM, Yufei Gu wrote: > > +1 > Yufei > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:04 AM Russell Spitzer > wrote: >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 11:36 AM Szehon Ho > > wrote: >>

Re: [VOTE] Add overwriteRequested to RegisterTableRequest in REST spec

+1 (non-binding) > On Feb 13, 2025, at 9:36 AM, Daniel Weeks wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 9:07 AM Fokko Driesprong > wrote: >> +1 >> >> Op do 13 feb 2025 om 18:06 schreef Steven Wu > >: >>> +1 here. >>> >>> already approved t

Re: [VOTE] Allow Row-Lineage with Equality Deletes

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Huang-Hsiang > On Feb 20, 2025, at 9:37 AM, huaxin gao wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks Russell! > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 1:57 AM Fokko Driesprong > wrote: >> +1 >> >> Thanks Russell! >> >> Op do 20 feb 2025 om 10:25 schreef Péter

Re: [VOTE] Java implementation notes around current-snapshot-id

+1 (non binding) > On Feb 25, 2025, at 8:27 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 6:53 PM Fokko Driesprong wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> Recently, there was confusion about valid values for the >> current-snapshot-id, which led

Re: [VOTE] Minor clarification for Geo Spec

+1 (non-binding) > On May 6, 2025, at 2:53 PM, Ryan Blue wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks to Jia and Szehon for the quick turn-around getting this done! > > On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 2:37 PM Jia Yu > wrote: >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks for putting this together! >

Re: [DISCUSS] v4 - One file commits

I am interested in this idea and looking forward to collaboration. Thanks, Huang-Hsiang > On Jun 2, 2025, at 10:14 AM, namratha mk wrote: > > Hello, > > I am interested in contributing to this effort. > > Thanks, > Namratha > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 1:36 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.