Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 RC2

+1 (binding) verified sigs/checksums/tests On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 7:48 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 7:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Ap

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 RC2

+1 checked the signatures and run some tests Fokko Driesprong ezt írta (időpont: 2025. márc. 12., Sze, 12:21): > +1 (binding) > > I've updated the PR , > but then forgot about it. > > Kind regards, > Fokko > > Op wo 12 mrt 2025 om 11:35 schre

Re: [Flink] Remove FlinkSink for Flink 2.0

Hi JB, V3 is another topic, but it would be good to start looking into that. Hey Steven, Flink 2.0 actually did not remove the old interfaces, which was not what I expected when I started this conversation. Turns out, old interfaces have been moved to ".legacy" packages. I'm in the process of ve

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 RC2

+1 (binding) I've updated the PR , but then forgot about it. Kind regards, Fokko Op wo 12 mrt 2025 om 11:35 schreef Eduard Tudenhöfner < etudenhoef...@apache.org>: > +1 (binding) > > verified sigs/checksums/tests > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 7

Re: [Flink] Remove FlinkSink for Flink 2.0

Once we deprecate FlinkSink, we should also upgrade IcebergSink from `Experimental` to `PublicEvolving` On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 10:01 AM Steven Wu wrote: > Max, thanks for confirming the Flink 2.0 behavior. With the latest > information, here are my suggestions > > 1) I am fine with deleting th

Re: [Flink] Remove FlinkSink for Flink 2.0

Max, thanks for confirming the Flink 2.0 behavior. With the latest information, here are my suggestions 1) I am fine with deleting the old `FlinkSource` in the upcoming flink 2.0 module (but keeping them in flink 1.x modules). As discussed in a previous thread, the new FLIP-27 source has been bake

Re: [Discussion] Versioned SQL UDFs (Catalog routines) in Iceberg

Hi everyone, I've updated the design document[1] based on the previous comments. Additionally, I've included the SQL UDF syntax supported by various vendors, including Dremio, Snowflake, Databricks, and Trino. I'm happy to schedule a separate sync if a deeper discussion is needed. Let's keep movi

Re: [DISCUSS] March board report

Hey Ryan, Thanks for putting this together. I noticed we don't have a "Rust" section in the Project Activity section. I think we can add a few lines based on the community syncs doc. We might also want

Re: [DISCUSS] March board report

Hi, Ryan: Thanks for driving this, here is the rust implementation updates: 1. Add StrictMetricsEvaluator 2. Add `add_existing_parquet` to `FastAppendAction` 3. Add ViewMetadataBuilder 4. Add puffin file reader On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 4:42 AM Kevin Liu wrote: > Hey Ryan, > > Thanks for putting

Re: [Flink] Remove FlinkSink for Flink 2.0

I agree with the general sentiment, that we should remove FlinkSource, but only deprecate FlinkSink. I understand Steven's approach to remove the deprecated classes only from the latest Flink version, but keep them for the old versions, but I have some concerns with this. My main concern is that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.7.2 RC2

+1 (non-binding) Verified signature, checksum, and license. Tested against JDK 17 (`17.0.6-zulu`). Thanks for running the release! Best, Kevin Liu On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 5:01 AM Péter Váry wrote: > +1 > > checked the signatures and run some tests > > Fokko Driesprong ezt írta (időpont: 2025.