With 10 +1 (4 binding) the VOTE passed.
Thanks everyone
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 4:50 AM Fanng wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Christian Thiel 于2024年10月23日周三 08:22写道：
>
>> +1 (non-binding). Great feature, thanks!
>> --
>> *Von:* Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com>
>> *
Hi
Im just wondering, is a solution to put these stats in Puffin files?
There's already ComputeTableStatsSparkAction (and probably similar actions
in other engines), and I can imagine a quick metadata aggregation job to
compute min/max/null_values, etc. Also how accurate would we need the
stats? T
Hello Vladimir,
I want to raise that we've been observing similar behavior differences
regarding CREATE OR REPLACE between Hive/Hadoop catalog and REST catalog at
here: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/11109
The context: Iceberg spark integration test has traditionally only included
tests
Hey JB,
I don't think we're ever using e.g. *Lists.newArrayList()* without the
diamond syntax in the codebase, so it's typically always *List list
= Lists.newArrayList()*.
So I wonder how much of an issue that actually is? Do you have examples in
the codebase that don't use the diamond syntax and
Hi,
That was my idea: why not leveraging the JDK11 style here as we are
now based on JDK11+ ?
Thoughts ?
Regards
JB
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 7:50 PM Alex Dutra
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> But aren't we now building on Java 11+? I think we could go one step ahead
> and replace most of these Guava fa
Do I recall our agreement that any V3 spec changes that will be released
bear no compatibility guarantees until we close V3 and vote on it as a
whole?
Yes. We can make changes to v3 until the community votes to adopt and close
the version to any new forward-breaking changes. That vote isn’t tied t
Cool, I'll start a vote later.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 2:48 PM Xuanwo wrote:
> Looks good to me. Would you like to start a poll for this?
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024, at 14:25, Renjie Liu wrote:
>
> Seems that there is no objection about this meeting, but we have different
> options about timing. S
Seems that there is no objection about this meeting, but we have different
options about timing. Should we start a poll for timing?
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 11:27 PM Sung Yun wrote:
> Thank you for starting this thread Xuanwo, I'm +1 for a Iceberg Rust
> meeting.
>
> Regarding the meeting time, I
Hi everyone,
FYI, the next community python library sync meeting will be on Tuesday
(10/29/2024) at 9 AM (US/Pacific). Here is the meeting agenda for the
topics to discuss:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oMKodaZJrOJjPfc8PDVAoTdl02eGQKHlhwuggiw7s9U/edit?tab=t.0#bookmark=kix.iirevm9hrazn.
Pleas
