Re: Single Reader Benchmarks on S3-like Storage

2021-03-23 Thread Jack Ye
hopefully to the community. > > > > Meanwhile, I’ll checkout S3FileIO and try to change my benchmarks to use > it. > > > > Thanks, > > Mayur > > > > > > *From:* Daniel Weeks > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 23, 2021 7:17 PM > *To:* Iceberg Dev List >

RE: Single Reader Benchmarks on S3-like Storage

2021-03-23 Thread Mayur Srivastava
optimizations? This will quite useful for us and hopefully to the community. Meanwhile, I’ll checkout S3FileIO and try to change my benchmarks to use it. Thanks, Mayur From: Daniel Weeks Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 7:17 PM To: Iceberg Dev List Subject: Re: Single Reader Benchmarks on S3-like Storage

Re: Single Reader Benchmarks on S3-like Storage

2021-03-23 Thread Daniel Weeks
Hey Mayur, thanks for the detailed writeup. I would say that what you're looking at in terms of performance is very specific to the file system implementation (like you've already discovered by replacing the GHFS implementation). Within iceberg, this is scoped very specifically to the FileIO impl

Single Reader Benchmarks on S3-like Storage

2021-03-23 Thread Mayur Srivastava
Hi, I've been running performance benchmarks on core Iceberg readers on Google Cloud Storage (GCS). I would like to share some of my results and check whether there are ways to improve performance on S3-like storage in general. The details (including sample code) are listed below the question