Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.0rc2

Thank you everyone for verifying the release and voting! The 72 hours have passed, and a minimum of 3 binding votes have been cast: +1 Chinmay Bhat (non-binding) +1 Kevin Liu (non-binding) +1 André Luis Anastácio (non-binding) +1 Honah J (binding) +1 Mehul Batra (non-binding) +1 Jack Ye (binding)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.0rc2

Huge thanks Sung for running this, that's a long list of new features. +1 (binding) - Validated signatures/checksums/license - Ran tests locally and identified two minor issues (#979 , #980 )

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.0rc2

+1 (binding) - Verified signature, license, checksum - Ran build and tests (python 3.11) - Ran S3 and Glue integration and manual tests Best, Jack Ye On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 5:00 AM Mehul Batra wrote: > +1 (Non-binding) > >- Validated signatures/checksums/license >- Ran tests (make te

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.0rc2

+1 (Non-binding) - Validated signatures/checksums/license - Ran tests (make test & make test-s3) in Python3.11.5 Thanks, everyone for testing and voting. Warm regards, Mehul Batra On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 1:47 PM Honah J. wrote: > +1 (binding) > >- Validated signatures/checksums/lice

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.0rc2

Hi all, thank you for your help in testing and verifying the release. We are still in need of at least 2 more binding votes. Sung On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 4:16 AM Honah J. wrote: > +1 (binding) > >- Validated signatures/checksums/license >- Ran tests (make test-coverage) in Python3.11

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.0rc2

+1 (binding) - Validated signatures/checksums/license - Ran tests (make test-coverage) in Python3.11 - Ran Glue integration tests Thank you Sung for running the release and thanks everyone for testing and voting. Best regards, Honah On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 5:36 PM André Luis Anastácio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.0rc2

+1 (non-binding) - Validated signatures / checksums - Checked license - Ran some code examples in Python 3.12 André Anastácio On Monday, July 29th, 2024 at 2:42 PM, Kevin Liu wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > Verified signatures/checksums/license. Ran unit and integration tests. Logs > are attache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.0rc2

Tested 0.7.0rc2. +1 (non-binding) - validated signatures & checksums - checked license - RAT checks passed - ran tests and test-coverage with Python 3.9 Thank you everyone for the hard work! Best, Chinmay On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 3:39 PM Sung Yun wrote: > Thank you Fokko for your help in setti

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.0rc2

Thank you Fokko for your help in setting the next steps for the course of resolution. To clarify as a follow up to Fokko' suggestion: the PyPi release under test for 0.7.0rc2 can now be found here: https://pypi.org/project/pyiceberg/0.7.0rc2/ We will leave this VOTE thread open for votes to decid

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.0rc2

Hey everyone, I just yanked the release from PyPi. I still encourage everyone to test out PyIceberg 0.7.0rc1 to check if everything works on their end and give all the awesome new features a go. Since the release has been yanked, and releases are immutable in PyPi, there are two ways forward:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.0rc2

Hi ndrluis, Thank you VERY much for flagging this. I really appreciate you bringing this to our attention so quickly. This is the first time I'm running the release front to end, and I missed one small detail that led to this mishap. I will cancel this vote, and remove the artifact from PyPi bef

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.0rc2

Hey Sung Yun, Thank you for starting the release. I was checking PyPI, and it looks like the release candidate was published as version 0.7.0 (https://pypi.org/project/pyiceberg/0.7.0/). On Friday, July 26th, 2024 at 7:35 PM, Sung Yun wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I propose that we release the fo