With 12 +1 votes (3 binding) and no -1, this passes.
Thanks, everyone! We'll start getting the rest of the release process going.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 6:10 AM leilei hu wrote:
> +1(non-binding)
> verified(java 8):
>
> - Create table using HiveCatalog and HadoopCatalog
> - Spark Structured St
+1(non-binding)
verified(java 8):
- Create table using HiveCatalog and HadoopCatalog
- Spark Structured Streaming
- Spark query with Spark’s DataSourceV2 API
- Checksum, build and test
> 2022年10月11日 下午2:57，Jahagirdar, Amogh 写道：
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Verified signature/checksums/license/b
+1 (non-binding)
Verified signature/checksums/license/build/tests with JDK 8
Thanks,
Amogh Jahagirdar
From: Yufei Gu
Reply-To: "dev@iceberg.apache.org"
Date: Monday, October 10, 2022 at 11:52 PM
To: "dev@iceberg.apache.org"
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL][VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.0.0 RC0
CAU
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified Signature
- Verified Checksum
- Verified License
- Verified build and test with Java 11
- Test with Apache Spark 3.3
Best,
Yufei
`This is not a contribution`
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 7:07 PM Rushan Jiang wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> - Verify Signature
> - Verify Che
+1 (non-binding)
- Verify Signature
- Verify Checksums
- Verify License Documentation
- Verify Build and Test in Java 8 and 11
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 7:11 PM Daniel Weeks wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified sigs/sums/license/build/test (java 8)
>
> Everything checks out,
> -Dan
>
> On Mon, Oct 1
: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.0.0 RC0
+1 (binding)
Verified sigs/sums/license/build/test (java 8)
Everything checks out,
-Dan
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 3:25 PM Steven Wu
mailto:stevenz...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Never mind. Missed the information that this 1.0.0 is based on the lat
+1 (binding)
Verified sigs/sums/license/build/test (java 8)
Everything checks out,
-Dan
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 3:25 PM Steven Wu wrote:
> Never mind. Missed the information that this 1.0.0 is based on the latest
> 0.14.1 release, which doesn't contain the PR 5318. I thought it was based
> on
Never mind. Missed the information that this 1.0.0 is based on the latest
0.14.1 release, which doesn't contain the PR 5318. I thought it was based
on the latest master branch.
+1 (non-binding)
- Verify signature
- Verify checksum
- Tried SQL insert and query with Flink 1.15
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022
Ryan,
It seems that this PR (merged on July 28) for the Flink FLIP-27 source is
not included. https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/5318
The commit ID still contains the old file in the old location. The new
location should be "flink/source/IcebergTableSource.java" with FLIP-27
config support.
h
Whoops, sorry for the noise, I made a typo and was using the wrong scala
version of the iceberg-spark-runtime jar, this works.
+1 (non-binding)
- Verify signature
- Verify checksum
- Verify license documentation
- Tried with Spark 3.3
- Ran unit tests
Thanks
Szehon
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:
Hi,
I get a NoClassDefFoundError from IcebergSparkExtensions when running Spark
3.3, with iceberg-spark-runtime-3.3_2.12-1.0.0.jar. I noticed this jar
doesn't contain scala classes, unlike previous jars
iceberg-spark-runtime-3.3_2.12-0.14.1.jar.
scala> spark.sql("show databases").show
java.lang.
+1 (non-binding)
- validated checksum and signature
- checked license docs & ran RAT checks
- ran build and tests with JDK11
Eduard
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 8:01 AM Ajantha Bhat wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
>- Verified the Spark runtime jar contents.
>- Checked license docs,
+1 (non-binding)
- Ran the license and checksum
- Ran test suite of Trino against 1.0.0 and didn't see any issues
Cheers, Fokko
Op ma 10 okt. 2022 om 08:00 schreef Ajantha Bhat :
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
>- Verified the Spark runtime jar contents.
>- Checked license docs, ran RAT checks.
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified the Spark runtime jar contents.
- Checked license docs, ran RAT checks.
- Validated checksum and signature.
Thanks,
Ajantha
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:45 AM Prashant Singh
wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Wanted to know your thoughts on whether we should also
Hello Everyone,
Wanted to know your thoughts on whether we should also include the
following bug fixes in this release as well:
1. MERGE INTO nullability fix, leads to query failure otherwise:
*Reported instances :*
a.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73424454/spark-iceberg-merge-into-issue-ca
+1 (binding)
- Checked license docs, ran RAT checks
- Validated checksum and signature
- Built and tested with Java 11
- Built binary artifacts with Java 8
On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 3:42 PM Ryan Blue wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I propose that we release the following RC as the official
16 matches
Mail list logo
