I am withdrawing RC2 from voting because of issues that were found during
testing. RC3 will follow shortly.
Thanks, everyone, for your help testing RC2!
- Carl
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 1:44 PM Szehon Ho
wrote:
> Got it, I somehow thought changes were manually cherry-picked, thanks for
> clarific
Got it, I somehow thought changes were manually cherry-picked, thanks for
clarification.
Thanks
Szehon
> On 9 Aug 2021, at 13:34, Ryan Blue wrote:
>
> Szehon, I think that should make it because the RC will come from master.
>
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 12:56 PM Szehon Ho wrote:
> If it’s easy
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/2954 should be ready to merge. The
CI passed.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 9:08 AM Wing Yew Poon wrote:
> Ryan,
> Thanks for the review. Let me look into implementing your refactoring
> suggestion.
> - Wing Yew
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 8:41 AM Ryan Blue wro
Szehon, I think that should make it because the RC will come from master.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 12:56 PM Szehon Ho
wrote:
> If it’s easy, would it make sense to include Russell’s fix as well for
> Metadata tables query , as it affects Spark 3.1 (a regression from Spark
> 3.0)? https://github.c
If it’s easy, would it make sense to include Russell’s fix as well for Metadata
tables query , as it affects Spark 3.1 (a regression from Spark 3.0)?
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/2877/files
The issue : https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/2783 was at some point
marked for 0.12 re
Thanks for pointing that one out, Jack! That would be good to get in as
well.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 11:02 AM Jack Ye wrote:
> If we are considering recutting the branch, please also include this PR
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/2943 which fixes the validation
> when creating a schema
If we are considering recutting the branch, please also include this PR
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/2943 which fixes the validation when
creating a schema with identifier fields, thank you!
-Jack Ye
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 9:08 AM Wing Yew Poon
wrote:
> Ryan,
> Thanks for the review.
Ryan,
Thanks for the review. Let me look into implementing your refactoring
suggestion.
- Wing Yew
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 8:41 AM Ryan Blue wrote:
> Yeah, I agree. We should fix this for the 0.12.0 release. That said, I
> plan to continue testing this RC because it won't change that much since
Yeah, I agree. We should fix this for the 0.12.0 release. That said, I plan
to continue testing this RC because it won't change that much since this
affects the Spark extensions in 3.1. Other engines and Spark 3.0 or older
should be fine.
I left a comment on the PR. I think it looks good, but we s
Hi Wing Yew,
I will create a new RC once this patch is committed.
Thanks.
- Carl
On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 4:29 PM Wing Yew Poon
wrote:
> Sorry to bring this up so late, but this just came up: there is a Spark
> 3.1 (runtime) compatibility issue (not found by existing tests), which I
> have a fi
Sorry to bring this up so late, but this just came up: there is a Spark 3.1
(runtime) compatibility issue (not found by existing tests), which I have a
fix for in https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/2954. I think it would be
really helpful if it can go into 0.12.0.
- Wing Yew
On Fri, Aug 6, 20
+1 (non-binding)
Verified release test and AWS integration test, issue found in test but not
blocking for release (https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/2948)
Verified Spark 3.1 and 3.0 operations and new SQL extensions and procedures
on EMR.
Thanks,
Jack Ye
On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 1:19 AM Kyle
+1 (binding)
I verified:
- KEYS signature & checksum
- ./gradlew clean build (tests, etc)
- Ran Spark jobs on Kubernetes after building from the tarball at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-0.12.0-rc2/
- Spark 3.1.1 batch jobs against both Hadoop and Hive tables
+1 (non-binding)
* Verify Signature Keys
* Verify Checksum
* dev/check-license
* Build
* Run tests (though some timeout failures, on Hive MR test..)
Thanks
Szehon
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 2:23 PM Daniel Weeks wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I verified sigs/sums, license, build, and test
>
> -Dan
>
> O
+1 (binding)
I verified sigs/sums, license, build, and test
-Dan
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 2:53 PM Ryan Murray wrote:
> After some wrestling w/ Spark I discovered that the problem was with my
> test. Some SparkSession apis changed. so all good here now.
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Aug 4, 202
After some wrestling w/ Spark I discovered that the problem was with my
test. Some SparkSession apis changed. so all good here now.
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 11:29 PM Ryan Murray wrote:
> Thanks for the help Carl, got it sorted out. The gpg check now works. For
> those who were in
Thanks for the help Carl, got it sorted out. The gpg check now works. For
those who were interested I used a canned wget command in my history and it
pulled the RC0 :-)
Will have a PR to fix the Nessie Catalog soon.
Best,
Ryan
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 9:21 PM Carl Steinbach wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
>
Hi Ryan,
Can you please run the following command to see which keys in your public
keyring are associated with my UID?
% gpg --list-keys c...@apache.org
pub rsa4096/5A5C7F6EB9542945 2021-07-01 [SC]
160F51BE45616B94103ED24D5A5C7F6EB9542945
uid [ultimate] Carl W. Steinbach
To make this easier for everyone else, here are the commands you need to
run to verify the release tarball:
curl https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS -o KEYS
gpg --import KEYS
gpg --verify apache-iceberg-0.12.0.tar.gz.asc apache-iceberg-0.12.0.tar.gz
And here's what I see when I ru
Ryan, did you re-import the KEYS file? Carl's code signing key is in the
linked KEYS file.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 11:12 AM Ryan Murray wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Unfortunately I have to give -1
>
> I had trouble w/ the keys:
>
> gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-iceberg-0.12.0.tar.gz'
> gpg: Signat
Hi all,
Unfortunately I have to give -1
I had trouble w/ the keys:
gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-iceberg-0.12.0.tar.gz'
gpg: Signature made Mon 02 Aug 2021 03:36:30 CEST
gpg:using RSA key FAFEB6EAA60C95E2BB5E26F01FF0803CB78D539F
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
A
21 matches
Mail list logo
