Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg-rust based Ruby bindings

I like the vision of building multi-langage sdk on top rust kernel. Apache OpenDAL is also another successful story of this approach. On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 11:35 AM Zheng Hu wrote: > From my understanding, the most abstracted approach for implementing a > multi-l

Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg-rust based Ruby bindings

>From my understanding, the most abstracted approach for implementing a multi-language SDK is: building another language SDK (Python, Ruby, Go, etc) on top of the Iceberg-Rust SDK. In this case, we can make our community resources focus on the rust native kernel, and all of the other language bi

Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg-rust based Ruby bindings

> Do you know how big the Ruby data community is? I think the most important part is that it gets some traction and will continue to be maintained. Its a great question Fokko! I'd say that the data community in Ruby is nascent, but definitely exists. There are some prolific folks like Andrew Kane

Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg-rust based Ruby bindings

Let's just leave this thread as-is and not bump it. On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, at 15:11, Chris Atkins wrote: > Hi Renji, > > Sorry about that yes it is! I sent it in, but realised that it wasn't showing > up because I wasn't subscribed to the mailing list, so I subscribed and then > resubmitted after

Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg-rust based Ruby bindings

Hi Chris, Thanks for raising this. Do you know how big the Ruby data community is? I think the most important part is that it gets some traction and will continue to be maintained. I fully agree that building on top of iceberg-rust makes a lot of sense, since also with PyIceberg we're running int

Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg-rust based Ruby bindings

Hi Renji, Sorry about that yes it is! I sent it in, but realised that it wasn't showing up because I wasn't subscribed to the mailing list, so I subscribed and then resubmitted after talking to Xuanwo on Slack. Is there a way to close this accidental duplicate thread? On 6 Aug 2024 at 5:06:40 PM

Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg-rust based Ruby bindings

Hi, Chris: Seems duplicated with this thread On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 12:54 AM Chris Atkins wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm following up on a discussion > from >

Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg-rust based Ruby bindings

Hi, Chris I love this idea. One of the main reasons I started working on iceberg-rust is due to the potential that a rust-powered iceberg core can offer. I'm not an experienced ruby developer, but I'm willing to help with some CI setup or docs since I have some experience in the opendal commun

Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg-rust based Ruby bindings

Hi, Chris: Thanks for raising this. Generally I'm +1 with building ruby bindings on top of rust implementation, who would help introduce iceberg into the ruby ecosystem. On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 7:30 PM Chris Atkins wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm following up on a discussion >