[RESULT] [VOTE] Small spec change for default values

With 13 +1 votes and no -1 or +0, this passes. Thanks everyone! This should go in soon, we're just adding some examples and making slight clarifications to the wording. On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 12:40 PM Daniel Weeks wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025, 3:12 PM Anton Okolnychyi > wrot

Re: [VOTE] Small spec change for default values

+1 (binding) On Wed, Apr 23, 2025, 3:12 PM Anton Okolnychyi wrote: > +1 (binding) > > The proposed V3 behavior would already be a lot more flexible than what > most engines support in the industry today. It is also not covered by the > SQL standard, so there is no need to overcomplicate the spec

Re: [VOTE] Small spec change for default values

+1 (binding) The proposed V3 behavior would already be a lot more flexible than what most engines support in the industry today. It is also not covered by the SQL standard, so there is no need to overcomplicate the spec without actual use cases. - Anton ср, 23 квіт. 2025 р. о 10:27 Ryan Blue пи

Re: [VOTE] Small spec change for default values

+1 (binding) On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 8:39 AM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Kind regards, > Fokko > > Op wo 23 apr 2025 om 03:08 schreef Gang Wu : > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 4:42 AM Prashant Singh >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> Best, >>> Prashant

Re: [VOTE] Small spec change for default values

+1 (binding) Kind regards, Fokko Op wo 23 apr 2025 om 03:08 schreef Gang Wu : > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 4:42 AM Prashant Singh > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Best, >> Prashant Singh >> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 2:55 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >> etudenhoef...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Small spec change for default values

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 4:42 AM Prashant Singh wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Prashant Singh > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 2:55 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < > etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 7:31 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> wrote: >> >>> +1

Re: [VOTE] Small spec change for default values

+1 (non binding) Thanks, Steve Zhang > On Apr 22, 2025, at 1:41 PM, Prashant Singh wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Prashant Singh > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 2:55 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner > wrote: >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 7:31 AM Jean-Bapti

Re: [VOTE] Small spec change for default values

+1 (non-binding) Best, Prashant Singh On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 2:55 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 7:31 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> +1 (non binding) >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 11:20 PM Ryan Blue wrote: >> > >> > Hi everyone, >> >

Re: [VOTE] Small spec change for default values

+1 On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 7:31 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 11:20 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I’d like to vote on the spec changes in PR 12841. This is a small change > that makes handling default values for

Re: [VOTE] Small spec change for default values

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 11:20 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I’d like to vote on the spec changes in PR 12841. This is a small change that > makes handling default values for structs much easier. Initially, we allowed > both a struct and its fields to have

Re: [VOTE] Small spec change for default values

+1 to the direction (non-binding). Left some clarification comments on the PR. Thanks, Walaa. On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 10:57 PM Manu Zhang wrote: > +1 (non-binding) except for some ambiguity between struct field and fields > within struct (Russell already made a nice suggestion). > > Thanks, >

Re: [VOTE] Small spec change for default values

+1 (non-binding) except for some ambiguity between struct field and fields within struct (Russell already made a nice suggestion). Thanks, Manu On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 7:10 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 3:38 PM Russell Spitzer > wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Small spec change for default values

+1 (binding) On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 3:38 PM Russell Spitzer wrote: > +1 (Binding) > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 4:21 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I’d like to vote on the spec changes in PR 12841 >> . This is a small change >> that make

Re: [VOTE] Small spec change for default values

+1 (Binding) On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 4:21 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I’d like to vote on the spec changes in PR 12841 > . This is a small change > that makes handling default values for structs much easier. Initially, we > allowed both a

[VOTE] Small spec change for default values

Hi everyone, I’d like to vote on the spec changes in PR 12841 . This is a small change that makes handling default values for structs much easier. Initially, we allowed both a struct and its fields to have default values, but the values could conflict.