Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.9.1rc1

Thanks everyone for voting. We have 3 binding votes (Honah, Eduard, Fokko) and 4 non-binding votes (JB, Manu, Sung, Kevin). I'll release the artifacts shortly. Eduard, regarding to the errors. What version of Python are you using? Ray is still working on 3.13 support, but it passes the rest of th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.9.1rc1

+1 (binding) checked license and unit/integration tests. I've had a few failing tests related to ray. tests/integration/test_reads.py::test_ray_nan_rewritten[session_catalog_hive] FAILED tests/integration/test_reads.py::test_ray_nan_rewritten[session_catalog] FAILED tests/integration/test_read

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.9.1rc1

+1 (binding) - Signature, checksum, licenses - Ran some tests against example notebooks . Kind regards, Fokko Op ma 28 apr 2025 om 17:59 schreef Kevin Liu : > +1 non-binding > > I verified > * signature, checksum, license > * Ran unit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.9.1rc1

+1 non-binding I verified * signature, checksum, license * Ran unit and integration tests with python 3.12.9 on M1 Thanks for driving the release, Fokko! Best, Kevin Liu On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 7:04 PM Honah J. wrote: > +1 (binding) > > 1. Verified sigs/checksum/license > 2. Ran "make test-co

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.9.1rc1

+1 (binding) 1. Verified sigs/checksum/license 2. Ran "make test-coverage" using python 3.10 Thanks Fokko for driving this release! Best, Honah On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 9:43 PM Sung Yun wrote: > Thank you Fokko for running this release! > > +1 (non-binding) > > I verified signatures, checksums

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.9.1rc1

Thank you Fokko for running this release! +1 (non-binding) I verified signatures, checksums, the LICENSE and NOTICE. Tested with python 3.11. Sung On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 10:51 AM Manu Zhang wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Built and tested with python 3.10. > > Thanks, > Manu > > On Sat, Apr 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.9.1rc1

+1 (non-binding) Built and tested with python 3.10. Thanks, Manu On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 12:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > I checked: > - LICENSE and NOTICE are good in the source distribution > - ASF header present in all expected files > - Hash and checksum are good

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.9.1rc1

+1 (non binding) I checked: - LICENSE and NOTICE are good in the source distribution - ASF header present in all expected files - Hash and checksum are good - test and test-coverage work from source distribution Thanks ! Regards JB On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 5:05 PM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > > Hi

[VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.9.1rc1

Hi Everyone, I propose releasing the following RC as the official PyIceberg 0.9.1 release. Thanks everyone for contributing! A list of patches that went into this release: - https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/milestone/11?closed=1 The commit ID is 7e1cfd18e3f8089eeae165a4092bf94305a812