Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.1rc2

Thank you everyone for voting! The 72 hours have passed, and we have 3 binding votes: +1 André Luis Anastácio (non-binding) +1 Fokko Driesprong (binding) +1 Kevin Liu (non-binding) +1 Daniel Weeks (binding) +1 Chinmay Bhat (non-binding) +1 Honah J (binding) The release candidate has been accepted

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.1rc2

+1 (binding) - Validated signatures/checksum/license - Ran test with Python 3.11.9 Sorry for being late. Thanks Sung for running the release! Thanks everyone for contributing and testing! Best regards, Honah On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 5:04 PM Sung Yun wrote: > Hi folks! > > We are 1 binding vote

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.1rc2

Hi folks! We are 1 binding vote short of accepting this release candidate. The verification steps are very easy to follow and can be found here: https://py.iceberg.apache.org/verify-release/ Thank you all again for testing and verifying the release! Sung On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 12:39 PM Chinmay

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.1rc2

+1 (non-binding) - Verified signatures, checksums, license - Ran unit tests & test-coverage with Python 3.9.19 Best, Chinmay On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 10:02 PM Daniel Weeks wrote: > Thanks Sung! > > I agree with the comments that this doesn't require a new RC. > > +1 (binding) > > Verified sigs/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.1rc2

Thanks Sung! I agree with the comments that this doesn't require a new RC. +1 (binding) Verified sigs/sums/license/build/test with Python 3.11.9 Thanks, -Dan On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 3:34 PM Sung Yun wrote: > Hi Daniel, thank you very much for testing the installation thoroughly and > reporti

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.1rc2

Hi Daniel, thank you very much for testing the installation thoroughly and reporting these issues. We make note of the supported Python versions using the PyPi classifiers , but I agree t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.1rc2

I ran into a couple issues while trying to verify the release. The first appears to be a transient issue (we ran into something similar in the 0.6.1 release but I was able to install later). Package docutils (0.21.post1) not found. make: *** [install-dependencies] Error 1 The second issue is mor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.1rc2

+1 (non-binding) Verified signatures/checksums/licenses. Ran unit and integration tests. On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 2:42 AM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks Sung for running this 🙌 > > - Validated signatures/checksums/license > - Ran some basic tests (3.10) > > Kind regards, > Fokk

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.1rc2

+1 (binding) Thanks Sung for running this 🙌 - Validated signatures/checksums/license - Ran some basic tests (3.10) Kind regards, Fokko Op wo 14 aug 2024 om 19:57 schreef André Luis Anastácio : > >- validated signatures and checksums > > >- checked license > > >- ran tests and test-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.1rc2

- validated signatures and checksums - checked license - ran tests and test-coverage with Python 3.9.12 +1 (non-binding) André Anastácio On Tuesday, August 13th, 2024 at 10:19 PM, Sung Yun wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I propose that we release the following RC as the official PyIceberg 0.7.1 >

[VOTE] Release Apache PyIceberg 0.7.1rc2

Hi Everyone, I propose that we release the following RC as the official PyIceberg 0.7.1 release. A summary of the high level features: * Fix `delete` to trace existing manifests when a data file is partially rewritten * Fix 'to_arrow_batch_rea