> Amogh Jahagirdar
>
> *From: *Yufei Gu
> *Reply-To: *"dev@iceberg.apache.org"
> *Date: *Monday, October 10, 2022 at 11:52 PM
> *To: *"dev@iceberg.apache.org"
> *Subject: *RE: [EXTERNAL][VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.0.0 RC0
>
>
> *CAUTION*: This email
October 10, 2022 at 11:52 PM
> To: "dev@iceberg.apache.org <mailto:dev@iceberg.apache.org>"
> mailto:dev@iceberg.apache.org>>
> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL][VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.0.0 RC0
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.
+1 (non-binding)
Verified signature/checksums/license/build/tests with JDK 8
Thanks,
Amogh Jahagirdar
From: Yufei Gu
Reply-To: "dev@iceberg.apache.org"
Date: Monday, October 10, 2022 at 11:52 PM
To: "dev@iceberg.apache.org"
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL][VOTE] Release Apac
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified Signature
- Verified Checksum
- Verified License
- Verified build and test with Java 11
- Test with Apache Spark 3.3
Best,
Yufei
`This is not a contribution`
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 7:07 PM Rushan Jiang wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> - Verify Signature
> - Verify Che
+1 (non-binding)
- Verify Signature
- Verify Checksums
- Verify License Documentation
- Verify Build and Test in Java 8 and 11
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 7:11 PM Daniel Weeks wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified sigs/sums/license/build/test (java 8)
>
> Everything checks out,
> -Dan
>
> On Mon, Oct 1
: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.0.0 RC0
+1 (binding)
Verified sigs/sums/license/build/test (java 8)
Everything checks out,
-Dan
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 3:25 PM Steven Wu
mailto:stevenz...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Never mind. Missed the information that this 1.0.0 is based on the lat
+1 (binding)
Verified sigs/sums/license/build/test (java 8)
Everything checks out,
-Dan
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 3:25 PM Steven Wu wrote:
> Never mind. Missed the information that this 1.0.0 is based on the latest
> 0.14.1 release, which doesn't contain the PR 5318. I thought it was based
> on
Never mind. Missed the information that this 1.0.0 is based on the latest
0.14.1 release, which doesn't contain the PR 5318. I thought it was based
on the latest master branch.
+1 (non-binding)
- Verify signature
- Verify checksum
- Tried SQL insert and query with Flink 1.15
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022
Ryan,
It seems that this PR (merged on July 28) for the Flink FLIP-27 source is
not included. https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/5318
The commit ID still contains the old file in the old location. The new
location should be "flink/source/IcebergTableSource.java" with FLIP-27
config support.
h
Whoops, sorry for the noise, I made a typo and was using the wrong scala
version of the iceberg-spark-runtime jar, this works.
+1 (non-binding)
- Verify signature
- Verify checksum
- Verify license documentation
- Tried with Spark 3.3
- Ran unit tests
Thanks
Szehon
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:
Hi,
I get a NoClassDefFoundError from IcebergSparkExtensions when running Spark
3.3, with iceberg-spark-runtime-3.3_2.12-1.0.0.jar. I noticed this jar
doesn't contain scala classes, unlike previous jars
iceberg-spark-runtime-3.3_2.12-0.14.1.jar.
scala> spark.sql("show databases").show
java.lang.
+1 (non-binding)
- validated checksum and signature
- checked license docs & ran RAT checks
- ran build and tests with JDK11
Eduard
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 8:01 AM Ajantha Bhat wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
>- Verified the Spark runtime jar contents.
>- Checked license docs,
+1 (non-binding)
- Ran the license and checksum
- Ran test suite of Trino against 1.0.0 and didn't see any issues
Cheers, Fokko
Op ma 10 okt. 2022 om 08:00 schreef Ajantha Bhat :
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
>- Verified the Spark runtime jar contents.
>- Checked license docs, ran RAT checks.
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified the Spark runtime jar contents.
- Checked license docs, ran RAT checks.
- Validated checksum and signature.
Thanks,
Ajantha
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:45 AM Prashant Singh
wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Wanted to know your thoughts on whether we should also
Hello Everyone,
Wanted to know your thoughts on whether we should also include the
following bug fixes in this release as well:
1. MERGE INTO nullability fix, leads to query failure otherwise:
*Reported instances :*
a.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73424454/spark-iceberg-merge-into-issue-ca
+1 (binding)
- Checked license docs, ran RAT checks
- Validated checksum and signature
- Built and tested with Java 11
- Built binary artifacts with Java 8
On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 3:42 PM Ryan Blue wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I propose that we release the following RC as the official
Hi Everyone,
I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache Iceberg
1.0.0 release.
The commit ID is e2bb9ad7e792efca419fa7c4a1afde7c4c44fa01
* This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.0.0-rc0
* https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.0.0-rc0
*
https://gi
17 matches
Mail list logo
